These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33748097)

  • 1. Comparison of Quarterly and Yearly Calibration Data for Propensity Score Adjusted Web Survey Estimates.
    Irimata KE; He Y; Cai B; Shin HC; Parsons VL; Parker JD
    Surv Methods Insights Field; 2020; 2020():. PubMed ID: 33748097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours.
    Copas A; Burkill S; Conrad F; Couper MP; Erens B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):251. PubMed ID: 33032535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Propensity-score Adjusted Estimates for Selected Health Outcomes From the Research and Development Survey.
    Shin HC; Parker J; Parsons V; He Y; Irimata K; Cai B; Beresovsky V
    Vital Health Stat 1; 2022 Nov; (196):1-20. PubMed ID: 36409516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overview and Initial Results of the National Center for Health Statistics' Research and Development Survey.
    Parker J; Miller K; He Y; Scanlon P; Cai B; Shin HC; Parsons V; Irimata K
    Stat J IAOS; 2020 Nov; 36(4):1199-1211. PubMed ID: 35923778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The National Center for Health Statistics' 2015 and 2016 Research and Development Surveys.
    He Y; Cai B; Shin HC; Beresovsky V; Parsons V; Irimata K; Scanlon P; Parker J
    Vital Health Stat 1; 2020 Oct; (59):1-60. PubMed ID: 33151143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calibration Weighting Methods for the National Center for Health Statistics Research and Development Survey.
    Irimata KE; He Y; Parsons VL; Shin HC; Zhang G
    Vital Health Stat 2; 2023 Mar; (199):1-23. PubMed ID: 36940133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Research and Development Survey (RANDS) during COVID-19.
    Irimata KE; Scanlon PJ
    Stat J IAOS; 2022 Mar; 38(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 35928170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variable inclusion strategies through directed acyclic graphs to adjust health surveys subject to selection bias for producing national estimates.
    Li Y; Irimata KE; He Y; Parker J
    J Off Stat; 2022 Sep; 38(3):875-900. PubMed ID: 36157569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On modelling response propensity for dwelling unit (DU) level non-response adjustment in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).
    Wun LM; Ezzati-Rice TM; Diaz-Tena N; Greenblatt J
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(8):1875-84. PubMed ID: 17206601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonprobability Web surveys to measure sexual behaviors and attitudes in the general population: a comparison with a probability sample interview survey.
    Erens B; Burkill S; Couper MP; Conrad F; Clifton S; Tanton C; Phelps A; Datta J; Mercer CH; Sonnenberg P; Prah P; Mitchell KR; Wellings K; Johnson AM; Copas AJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Dec; 16(12):e276. PubMed ID: 25488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National Center for Health Statistics' 2019 Research and Development Survey, RANDS 3.
    Hu LR; Scanlon P; Miller K; He Y; Irimata KE; Zhang G; Cibelli Hibben K
    Vital Health Stat 1; 2023 Sep; (65):1-55. PubMed ID: 37751493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health estimate differences between six independent web surveys: different web surveys, different results?
    Schnell R; Klingwort J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):24. PubMed ID: 38281040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mode differences in a mixed-mode health interview survey among adults.
    Hoebel J; von der Lippe E; Lange C; Ziese T
    Arch Public Health; 2014; 72(1):46. PubMed ID: 25810913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Counting the uninsured: a comparison of national surveys.
    Fronstin P
    EBRI Issue Brief; 2000 Sep; (225):1-19. PubMed ID: 11184210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. General population norms for the EQ-5D-3 L in Norway: comparison of postal and web surveys.
    Stavem K; Augestad LA; Kristiansen IS; Rand K
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Oct; 16(1):204. PubMed ID: 30340499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Web and Telephone Responses From a National HIV and AIDS Survey.
    Jones MK; Calzavara L; Allman D; Worthington CA; Tyndall M; Iveniuk J
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2016 Jul; 2(2):e37. PubMed ID: 27473597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The adequacy of household survey data for evaluating the nongroup health insurance market.
    Cantor JC; Monheit AC; Brownlee S; Schneider C
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Aug; 42(4):1739-57. PubMed ID: 17610446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Propensity score matching and complex surveys.
    Austin PC; Jembere N; Chiu M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1240-1257. PubMed ID: 27460539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.