242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33750037)
1. Reliability analysis of successive Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology measurements in different keratoconus stages.
Flockerzi E; Häfner L; Xanthopoulou K; Daas L; Munteanu C; Langenbucher A; Seitz B
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 100(1):e83-e90. PubMed ID: 33750037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability analysis of successive Corvis ST® measurements in keratoconus 2 years after accelerated corneal crosslinking compared to untreated keratoconus corneas.
Xanthopoulou K; Seitz B; Belin MW; Flockerzi E
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 261(4):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 36305911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Keratoconus detection and classification from parameters of the Corvis®ST : A study based on algorithms of machine learning].
Langenbucher A; Häfner L; Eppig T; Seitz B; Szentmáry N; Flockerzi E
Ophthalmologe; 2021 Jul; 118(7):697-706. PubMed ID: 32970190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.
Chan TC; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 28559422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of new Corvis ST parameters in normal, Post-LASIK, Post-LASIK keratectasia and keratoconus eyes.
Yang K; Xu L; Fan Q; Gu Y; Song P; Zhang B; Zhao D; Pang C; Ren S
Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):5676. PubMed ID: 32231236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Corneal Deformation Parameters in Keratoconic and Normal Eyes Using a Non-contact Tonometer With a Dynamic Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Camera.
Mercer RN; Waring GO; Roberts CJ; Jhanji V; Wang Y; Filho JS; Hemings RA; Rocha KM
J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):625-631. PubMed ID: 28880338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.
Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V
J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Scheimpflug-derived corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices for detecting subclinical and mild keratectasia in a South Asian population.
Kataria P; Padmanabhan P; Gopalakrishnan A; Padmanaban V; Mahadik S; Ambrósio R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Mar; 45(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 30527442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal biomechanics in normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes.
Peyman A; Sepahvand F; Pourazizi M; Noorshargh P; Forouhari A
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):459. PubMed ID: 37968616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation Between Corneal Biomechanical Indices and the Severity of Keratoconus.
Koh S; Inoue R; Ambrósio R; Maeda N; Miki A; Nishida K
Cornea; 2020 Feb; 39(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 31478950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients.
Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):339. PubMed ID: 34544392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Yekta AA; Danesh Z; Reisdorf S; Khabazkhoob M; Heidari HR; Sadeghi J
J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):849-856. PubMed ID: 30540368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection.
Ambrósio R; Lopes BT; Faria-Correia F; Salomão MQ; Bühren J; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P
J Refract Surg; 2017 Jul; 33(7):434-443. PubMed ID: 28681902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of Corvis ST Parameters Including Updated Stress-Strain Index in Differentiating Between Normal, Forme-Fruste, Subclinical, and Clinical Keratoconic Eyes.
Miao YY; Ma XM; Qu ZX; Eliasy A; Wu BW; Xu H; Wang P; Zheng XB; Wang JJ; Ye YF; Chen SH; Elsheikh A; Bao FJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 258():196-207. PubMed ID: 37879454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In Vivo Early Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Corneal Cross-linking in Patients With Progressive Keratoconus.
Vinciguerra R; Romano V; Arbabi EM; Brunner M; Willoughby CE; Batterbury M; Kaye SB
J Refract Surg; 2017 Dec; 33(12):840-846. PubMed ID: 29227513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia and Corvis ST parameters for subclinical keratoconus.
Song Y; Feng Y; Qu M; Ma Q; Tian H; Li D; He R
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 43(5):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 36255612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optical Quality in Keratoconus Is Associated With Corneal Biomechanics.
Shugyo A; Koh S; Inoue R; Ambrósio R; Miki A; Maeda N; Nishida K
Cornea; 2021 Oct; 40(10):1276-1281. PubMed ID: 33332893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of white-to-white corneal diameter on biomechanical indices assessed by Pentacam Scheimpflug corneal tomography and corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology.
Lin Q; Shen Z
Int Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 42(5):1537-1543. PubMed ID: 34988748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Study on corneal biomechanical properties of suspicious keratoconus patients in corneal topography].
Zhang YH; Wang Y; Li LY; Zhang L; Wei PH
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 55(6):442-447. PubMed ID: 31189274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
