BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33750041)

  • 1. An analysis of radiographer preliminary image evaluation - A focus on common false negatives.
    Alexander-Bates I; Neep MJ; Davis B; Starkey D
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 68(3):237-244. PubMed ID: 33750041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing risk in the emergency department: a 12-month prospective longitudinal study of radiographer preliminary image evaluations.
    Brown C; Neep MJ; Pozzias E; McPhail SM
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2019 Sep; 66(3):154-162. PubMed ID: 31449740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysing false-positive errors when Australian radiographers use preliminary image evaluation.
    Takapautolo J; Neep M; Starkey D
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38923799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing diagnostic errors in the emergency department at the time of patient treatment.
    Petts A; Neep M; Thakkalpalli M
    Emerg Med Australas; 2023 Jun; 35(3):466-473. PubMed ID: 36471902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of intensive training in preliminary image evaluation (PIE) for radiographers in the emergency department of a regional hospital in New Zealand - A pilot study.
    Lewis K; Mdletshe S; Doubleday A; Pieterse T
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Mar; 30(2):688-693. PubMed ID: 38394826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Workload as a predictor of radiographer preliminary image evaluation accuracy.
    Brown C; Burck A; Neep MJ
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38956894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-time x-ray abnormality alerts for emergency departments using a radiographer comment model - a multisite pilot study.
    Klobasa I; Denham G; Baird M; Sim J; Petrie D; Roebuck DJ; Tonks A; Tu C; Sarrami P; Best J; Abood J; Jones C
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 37866158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of radiographer comment following a two-month experiential and blended learning in appendicular skeleton X-ray interpretation: The Singapore experience.
    Del Gante E; Kumar M; McEntee M; Sng LH; Tan CYY; Yeo CWK; Sim WY; Ekpo E
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 32540250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of radiographer preliminary clinical evaluation of skeletal trauma radiographs, in clinical practice at a district general hospital.
    Verrier W; Pittock LJ; Bodoceanu M; Piper K
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):312-318. PubMed ID: 35012880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Australian radiographer roles in the emergency department; evidence of regulatory compliance to improve patient safety - A narrative review.
    Pearce B; Nguyên VNB; Cowling C; Pinson JA; Sim J
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):319-331. PubMed ID: 38128248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is the effect of reporting all emergency department radiographs?
    Benger JR; Lyburn ID
    Emerg Med J; 2003 Jan; 20(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 12533366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A pilot study to assess radiographer preliminary clinical evaluation (PCE) introduced for emergency department adult appendicular X-ray examinations: Comparison of trained and untrained radiographers.
    Lidgett T; Pittock L; Piper K; Woznitza N
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 Mar; 29(2):307-312. PubMed ID: 36680870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilisation of radiographer comments to reduce errors in the radiology department.
    Tonks A; Tu C; Klobasa I
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2024 May; ():101432. PubMed ID: 38824091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computing eye gaze metrics for the automatic assessment of radiographer performance during X-ray image interpretation.
    McLaughlin L; Bond R; Hughes C; McConnell J; McFadden S
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Sep; 105():11-21. PubMed ID: 28750903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Formalising written preliminary image evaluation by Australian radiographers: a review of practice value.
    Tonks A; Varcoe J; Maurici S
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2024 Mar; 71(1):123-132. PubMed ID: 37635350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting of fracture radiographs by radiographers: the impact of a training programme.
    Loughran CF
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):945-50. PubMed ID: 8000837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed tomography colonography: Radiographer independent preliminary clinical evaluation for intraluminal pathology.
    Rimes SJ; Knapp KM; Meertens RM; Fox DL
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 Nov; 25(4):359-364. PubMed ID: 31582245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographer commenting of trauma radiographs: a survey of the benefits, barriers and enablers to participation in an Australian healthcare setting.
    Neep MJ; Steffens T; Owen R; McPhail SM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Aug; 58(4):431-8. PubMed ID: 24774619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of radiographic readings in the emergency department.
    Petinaux B; Bhat R; Boniface K; Aristizabal J
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Jan; 29(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 20825769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. False-positive preliminary radiograph interpretations in a pediatric emergency department: clinical and economic impact.
    Walsh-Kelly CM; Hennes HM; Melzer-Lange MD
    Am J Emerg Med; 1997 Jul; 15(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 9217523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.