132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33750245)
1. Linear Ballistic Accumulator Item Response Theory Model for Multidimensional Multiple-Alternative Forced-Choice Measurement of Personality.
Bunji K; Okada K
Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(4):658-678. PubMed ID: 33750245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Joint modeling of the two-alternative multidimensional forced-choice personality measurement and its response time by a Thurstonian D-diffusion item response model.
Bunji K; Okada K
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1091-1107. PubMed ID: 32394181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model.
Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):241-261. PubMed ID: 34370564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Item Response Theory Model for Incorporating Response Times in Forced-Choice Measures.
Guo Z; Wang D; Cai Y; Tu D
Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Jun; 84(3):450-480. PubMed ID: 38756463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
Lee H; Smith WZ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.
Huo Y; de la Torre J; Mun EY; Kim SY; Ray AE; Jiao Y; White HR
Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):834-55. PubMed ID: 25265910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GGUM-RANK Statement and Person Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Forced Choice Triplets.
Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S; Chernyshenko OS
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):226-240. PubMed ID: 31019358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MCMC Z-G: An IRT Computer Program for Forced-Choice Noncognitive Measurement.
Wang W; Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S; Louden R
Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Oct; 40(7):551-553. PubMed ID: 29881069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions.
Turner BM; Sederberg PB; Brown SD; Steyvers M
Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):368-84. PubMed ID: 23646991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating Optimal Weights for Compound Scores: A Multidimensional IRT Approach.
van Lier HG; Siemons L; van der Laar MAFJ; Glas CAW
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(6):914-924. PubMed ID: 30463444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generalized Fiducial Inference for Binary Logistic Item Response Models.
Liu Y; Hannig J
Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):290-324. PubMed ID: 26769340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A dual process item response theory model for polytomous multidimensional forced-choice items.
Qiu X; de la Torre J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):491-512. PubMed ID: 36967236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forced-Choice Assessment of Work-Related Maladaptive Personality Traits: Preliminary Evidence From an Application of Thurstonian Item Response Modeling.
Guenole N; Brown AA; Cooper AJ
Assessment; 2018 Jun; 25(4):513-526. PubMed ID: 27056730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times.
Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas JA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):144-68. PubMed ID: 22506914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Latent growth modeling of IRT versus CTT measured longitudinal latent variables.
Gorter R; Fox JP; Riet GT; Heymans MW; Twisk J
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):962-986. PubMed ID: 31271111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayes factors for the linear ballistic accumulator model of decision-making.
Evans NJ; Brown SD
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):589-603. PubMed ID: 28455795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of parameter estimation approaches for multi-unidimensional pairwise preference tests.
Tu N; Joo S; Lee P; Stark S
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2764-2786. PubMed ID: 35931936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A genetic algorithm for optimal assembly of pairwise forced-choice questionnaires.
Kreitchmann RS; Abad FJ; Sorrel MA
Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1476-1492. PubMed ID: 34505277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Joint Testlet Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling for Paired Local Item Dependence in Response Times and Response Accuracy.
Zhan P; Liao M; Bian Y
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():607. PubMed ID: 29922192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
