These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33750604)

  • 1. The use of imaging in endometrial cancer prior to potential surgery: Are guidelines being followed?
    Schnarr KL; Seow H; Elit LM; Pond GR; Helpman L; O'Leary E; Kong I
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 May; 161(2):361-366. PubMed ID: 33750604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-operative wait times in high-grade non-endometrioid endometrial cancer: Do surgical delays impact patient survival?
    Nica A; Sutradhar R; Kupets R; Covens A; Vicus D; Li Q; Ferguson SE; Gien LT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 164(2):333-340. PubMed ID: 34895897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SUVmax of 18FDG PET/CT as a predictor of high-risk endometrial cancer patients.
    Antonsen SL; Loft A; Fisker R; Nielsen AL; Andersen ES; Høgdall E; Tabor A; Jochumsen K; Fagö-Olsen CL; Asmussen J; Berthelsen AK; Christensen IJ; Høgdall C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 May; 129(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 23376805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of preoperative imaging on wait times, surgical approach and overall survival in endometrioid endometrial cancers.
    Schnarr KL; Seow H; Pond GR; Helpman L; Elit LM; O'Leary E; Kong I
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 May; 165(2):317-322. PubMed ID: 35248391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of cervical infiltration in Stage II endometrial cancer by different preoperative evaluation techniques (D&C, US, CT, MRI).
    Pete I; Godény M; Tóth E; Radó J; Pete B; Pulay T
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 14658593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume measured by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in patients with endometrial cancer.
    Chung HH; Lee I; Kim HS; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Cheon GJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Sep; 130(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 23791826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reliability of imaging modalities for preoperative assessment of patients with endometrial carcinoma].
    Rossard L; Rua C; Duquesne M; Vildé A; Marret H; Body G; Ouldamer L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013 Nov; 41(11):641-7. PubMed ID: 24183581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preoperative MRI and intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer.
    Tanaka T; Terai Y; Ono YJ; Fujiwara S; Tanaka Y; Sasaki H; Tsunetoh S; Kanemura M; Yamamoto K; Yamada T; Ohmichi M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jun; 25(5):879-83. PubMed ID: 25950131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the effect of guideline introduction on clinical practice and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer in Japan: a project of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guideline evaluation committee.
    Shigeta S; Nagase S; Mikami M; Ikeda M; Shida M; Sakaguchi I; Ushioda N; Takahashi F; Yamagami W; Yaegashi N; Udagawa Y; Katabuchi H
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e76. PubMed ID: 29027394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An intensive follow-up does not change survival of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer.
    Gadducci A; Cosio S; Fanucchi A; Cristofani R; Genazzani AR
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10928137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are preoperative histology and MRI useful for classification of endometrial cancer risk?
    Body N; Lavoué V; De Kerdaniel O; Foucher F; Henno S; Cauchois A; Laviolle B; Leblanc M; Levêque J
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():498. PubMed ID: 27430321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative deep myometrium assessment in endometrial cancer.
    Wu WJ; Yu MS; Su HY; Lin KS; Lu KL; Hwang KS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 52(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 23915853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilization of preoperative imaging in uterine cancer patients.
    Gien LT; Barbera L; Kupets R; Saskin R; Paszat L
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Nov; 115(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 19683807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time trends in the incidence of hysterectomy-corrected overall, type 1 and type 2 endometrial cancer in Denmark 1978-2014.
    Faber MT; Frederiksen K; Jensen A; Aarslev PB; Kjaer SK
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Aug; 146(2):359-367. PubMed ID: 28545689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperative staging of endometrial cancer using reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging: a preliminary study.
    Ota T; Hori M; Onishi H; Sakane M; Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Nakamoto A; Kimura T; Narumi Y; Tomiyama N
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5225-5235. PubMed ID: 28674966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using simple radiologic measurements to anticipate surgical challenge in endometrial cancer: a prospective study.
    Harrison RF; Mcnamara JE; Beaumont CB; Sadowski EA; Chappell RJ; Shahzad MM; Spencer RJ; Al-Niaimi AN; Barroilhet LM; Rose SL; Kushner DM
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jan; 29(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 30640690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined use of endometrial sample and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative risk-stratification of endometrial carcinomas.
    Luomaranta A; Bützow R; Pauna AR; Leminen A; Loukovaara M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 25287060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing endometrial cancer risk among US women: long-term trends using hysterectomy-adjusted analysis.
    Doll KM; Winn AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):318.e1-318.e9. PubMed ID: 31125544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between clinical and surgical staging for endometrial cancer in Thailand.
    Buranawattanachoke S; Leelahakorn S; Tangjitgamol S; Manusirivithaya S; Khunnarong J
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(4):685-90. PubMed ID: 19827895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in investigating complex atypical hyperplasia of the endometrium.
    Ofinran O; Balega J
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Aug; 68(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 27002383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.