167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33751220)
1. The validity of laser fluorescence (LF) and near-infrared reflection (NIRR) in detecting early proximal cavities.
Ahrari F; Akbari M; Mohammadi M; Fallahrastegar A; Najafi MN
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):4817-4824. PubMed ID: 33751220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study.
Menem R; Barngkgei I; Beiruti N; Al Haffar I; Joury E
Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):621-628. PubMed ID: 28194533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-vitro validation of near-infrared reflection for proximal caries detection.
Lederer A; Kunzelmann KH; Heck K; Hickel R; Litzenburger F
Eur J Oral Sci; 2019 Dec; 127(6):515-522. PubMed ID: 31774207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance of clinical-visual examination, digital bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence, and near-infrared light transillumination for detection of non-cavitated proximal enamel and dentin caries.
Kocak N; Cengiz-Yanardag E
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1621-1628. PubMed ID: 32333336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A pilot study of a modified radiographic technique for detecting early proximal cavities.
Akbari M; Zarch HH; Movagharipour F; Ahrari F
Caries Res; 2013; 47(6):612-6. PubMed ID: 24061285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of diagnostic effects of infrared imaging and bitewing radiography in proximal caries of permanent teeth.
Tonkaboni A; Saffarpour A; Aghapourzangeneh F; Fard MJK
Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 34(5):873-879. PubMed ID: 30324574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic validity of early proximal caries detection using near-infrared imaging technology on 3D range data of posterior teeth.
Litzenburger F; Heck K; Kaisarly D; Kunzelmann KH
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):543-553. PubMed ID: 34636940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces.
Bizhang M; Wollenweber N; Singh-Hüsgen P; Danesh G; Zimmer S
Head Face Med; 2016 Nov; 12(1):30. PubMed ID: 27809872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of different diagnostic techniques in detecting smooth surface caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: An in vitro study.
Bahramian H; Argani P; Baghalian A
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2020 Sep; 31():101867. PubMed ID: 32526375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography.
Virajsilp V; Thearmontree A; Aryatawong S; Paiboonwarachat D
Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 16532891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.
de Souza JF; Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Lussi A; de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25728100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of VistaCam IX Proxi and Bitewing Radiography for Detection of Interproximal Caries.
Valizadeh S; Safi Y; Beigvand A; Farahnaki A
J Dent (Shiraz); 2023 Dec; 24(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 38149228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accurate Detection of Non-Cavitated Proximal Caries in Posterior Permanent Teeth: An in vivo Study.
Alammar R; Sadaf D
Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2020; 13():1431-1436. PubMed ID: 32943960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In-vivo performance of impedance spectroscopy, laser fluorescence, and bitewing radiographs for occlusal caries detection.
Mortensen D; Hessing-Olsen I; Ekstrand KR; Twetman S
Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(4):293-299. PubMed ID: 29484311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical study of a laser fluorescence device for the detection of approximal caries in primary molars.
Chen J; Qin M; Ma W; Ge L
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Mar; 22(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 21951216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation.
Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Santos-Pinto L; Lussi A; Cordeiro RC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 22467694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What diagnostic strategy performs better for caries lesion detection on proximal surfaces of adolescents?
Moriyama CM; Novaes TF; Ferreira FR; Moro BLP; Imparato JCP; Diniz MB; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jun; 25(6):3977-3986. PubMed ID: 33404759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In Vitro Comparison of Several Methods for Initial Proximal Caries Detection.
Todorova V; Filipov I; Petrova R
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2020 Jun; 62(2):358-364. PubMed ID: 32666744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic validity of ICDAS and DIAGNOdent combined: an in vitro study in pre-cavitated lesions.
Iranzo-Cortés JE; Terzic S; Montiel-Company JM; Almerich-Silla JM
Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):543-548. PubMed ID: 28101736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro.
Göstemeyer G; Preus M; Elhennawy K; Schwendicke F; Paris S; Askar H
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Mar; 27(3):1143-1151. PubMed ID: 36112228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
