These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33751620)

  • 1. Sample size and power considerations for cluster randomized trials with count outcomes subject to right truncation.
    Li F; Tong G
    Biom J; 2021 Jun; 63(5):1052-1071. PubMed ID: 33751620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power calculations for cluster randomized trials (CRTs) with right-truncated Poisson-distributed outcomes: a motivating example from a malaria vector control trial.
    Mwandigha LM; Fraser KJ; Racine-Poon A; Mouksassi MS; Ghani AC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 49(3):954-962. PubMed ID: 32011684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials with time-to-event outcomes under the additive hazards mixed model.
    Blaha O; Esserman D; Li F
    Stat Med; 2022 Oct; 41(24):4860-4885. PubMed ID: 35908796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.
    Kristunas CA; Smith KL; Gray LJ
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 28270224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size requirements for testing treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Maleyeff L; Wang R; Haneuse S; Li F
    Stat Med; 2023 Nov; 42(27):5054-5083. PubMed ID: 37974475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power calculation for analyses of cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes via generalized estimating equations.
    Harrison LJ; Wang R
    Stat Med; 2021 Dec; 40(29):6674-6688. PubMed ID: 34558112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power and sample size calculations for cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when intracluster correlation coefficients vary by treatment arm.
    Kennedy-Shaffer L; Hughes MD
    Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 34879711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design and analysis of a 2-year parallel follow-up of repeated ivermectin mass drug administrations for control of malaria: Small sample considerations for cluster-randomized trials with count data.
    Jackson CL; Colborn K; Gao D; Rao S; Slater HC; Parikh S; Foy BD; Kittelson J
    Clin Trials; 2021 Oct; 18(5):582-593. PubMed ID: 34218684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size calculation for cluster randomized trials with zero-inflated count outcomes.
    Zhou Z; Li D; Zhang S
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(12):2191-2204. PubMed ID: 35139584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power considerations for generalized estimating equations analyses of four-level cluster randomized trials.
    Wang X; Turner EL; Preisser JS; Li F
    Biom J; 2022 Apr; 64(4):663-680. PubMed ID: 34897793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. swdpwr: A SAS macro and an R package for power calculations in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Chen J; Zhou X; Li F; Spiegelman D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jan; 213():106522. PubMed ID: 34818620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accounting for unequal cluster sizes in designing cluster randomized trials to detect treatment effect heterogeneity.
    Tong G; Esserman D; Li F
    Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(8):1376-1396. PubMed ID: 34923655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximin optimal cluster randomized designs for assessing treatment effect heterogeneity.
    Ryan MM; Esserman D; Li F
    Stat Med; 2023 Sep; 42(21):3764-3785. PubMed ID: 37339777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal design of longitudinal data analysis using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Biom J; 2017 Mar; 59(2):315-330. PubMed ID: 27878852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Tian Z; Preisser JS; Esserman D; Turner EL; Rathouz PJ; Li F
    Biom J; 2022 Mar; 64(3):419-439. PubMed ID: 34596912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size estimation for stratified individual and cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Kennedy-Shaffer L; Hughes MD
    Stat Med; 2020 May; 39(10):1489-1513. PubMed ID: 32003492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power calculation for cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.
    Harrison LJ; Chen T; Wang R
    Biometrics; 2020 Sep; 76(3):951-962. PubMed ID: 31625596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size estimation for modified Poisson analysis of cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.
    Li F; Tong G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1288-1305. PubMed ID: 33826454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Biom J; 2018 May; 60(3):616-638. PubMed ID: 29577363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative efficiency of equal versus unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.
    Liu J; Xiong C; Liu L; Wang G; Jingqin L; Gao F; Chen L; Li Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2021 Mar; 31(2):191-206. PubMed ID: 32970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.