BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33751731)

  • 1. The Use of Remote Programming for Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients With Chronic Pain During the COVID-19 Outbreak in China.
    Han Y; Lu Y; Wang D; Ran M; Ren Q; Xie D; Aziz TZ; Li L; Wang JJ
    Neuromodulation; 2021 Apr; 24(3):441-447. PubMed ID: 33751731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 10 kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Thoracic Pain: A Multicenter Case Series and a Guide for Optimal Anatomic Lead Placement.
    Sayed D; Foster J; Nairizi A; Sills S; Miller A
    Pain Physician; 2020 Jul; 23(4):E369-E376. PubMed ID: 32709183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precise management system for chronic intractable pain patients implanted with spinal cord stimulation based on a remote programming platform: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (PreMaSy study).
    Cheng Y; Xie D; Han Y; Guo S; Sun Z; Jing L; Man W; Liu D; Yang K; Lei D; Meng Z; Zhang H; Wang G; Wu W; Wang G; Lu Y
    Trials; 2023 Sep; 24(1):580. PubMed ID: 37691092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of different spinal cord stimulation paradigms for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain (PARS-trial): study protocol for a double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled crossover trial.
    Ahmadi R; Campos B; Hajiabadi MM; Doerr-Harim C; Tenckhoff S; Rasche D; Unterberg A; Vesper J; Bruckner T; Tronnier V
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):87. PubMed ID: 33494781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT.
    Amirdelfan K; Yu C; Doust MW; Gliner BE; Morgan DM; Kapural L; Vallejo R; Sitzman BT; Yearwood TL; Bundschu R; Yang T; Benyamin R; Burgher AH; Brooks ES; Powell AA; Subbaroyan J
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2035-2044. PubMed ID: 29858746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Redefining Spinal Cord Stimulation "Trials": A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Single-Stage Wireless Permanent Implantable Devices.
    North RB; Calodney A; Bolash R; Slavin KV; Creamer M; Rauck R; Vahedifar P; Fox I; Özaktay C; Panchal S; Vanquathem N
    Neuromodulation; 2020 Jan; 23(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 31157949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable trunk or limb pain: study protocol for a Chinese multicenter randomized withdrawal trial (CITRIP study).
    Lu Y; Mao P; Wang G; Tao W; Xiong D; Ma K; Li R; Feng D; Duan W; Li S; Fu Z; Feng Z; Jin Y; Wan L; Lu Y; Zhang D; Fan B; Wang JJ; Li L
    Trials; 2020 Oct; 21(1):834. PubMed ID: 33028415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management of Intractable Pain in Patients With Implanted Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using a Remote and Wireless Programming System.
    Lu Y; Xie D; Zhang X; Dong S; Zhang H; Yu B; Wang G; Wang JJ; Li L
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():594696. PubMed ID: 33363453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective, Multicenter Feasibility Study to Evaluate Differential Target Multiplexed Spinal Cord Stimulation Programming in Subjects With Chronic Intractable Back Pain With or Without Leg Pain.
    Fishman MA; Calodney A; Kim P; Slezak J; Benyamin R; Rehman A; Soto E; Yang T; Hacobian A; Griffith L; Yu C; Vallejo R
    Pain Pract; 2020 Sep; 20(7):761-768. PubMed ID: 32462791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Remote Management of Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices for Chronic Pain: Expert Recommendations on Best Practices for Proper Utilization and Future Considerations.
    Staats P; Deer TR; Hunter C; Li S; Dickerson D; Petersen E; Kapural L; Durbhakula S; Gilligan C; Slavin KV; Pope J; Amirdelfan K; Poree L; Naidu R; Levy RM
    Neuromodulation; 2023 Oct; 26(7):1295-1308. PubMed ID: 37632517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Efficacy of High-Density Spinal Cord Stimulation Among Trial, Implant, and Conversion Patients: A Retrospective Case Series.
    Provenzano DA; Rebman J; Kuhel C; Trenz H; Kilgore J
    Neuromodulation; 2017 Oct; 20(7):654-660. PubMed ID: 28547853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuromodulatory hacking: a review of the technology and security risks of spinal cord stimulation.
    Markosian C; Taruvai VS; Mammis A
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2020 Dec; 162(12):3213-3219. PubMed ID: 33009931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensor-driven position-adaptive spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain.
    Schultz DM; Webster L; Kosek P; Dar U; Tan Y; Sun M
    Pain Physician; 2012; 15(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 22270733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: 6-Month Australian Clinical Experience.
    Russo M; Verrills P; Mitchell B; Salmon J; Barnard A; Santarelli D
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):267-80. PubMed ID: 27228514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beneficial Therapeutic Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Advanced Cases of Parkinson's Disease With Intractable Chronic Pain: A Case Series.
    Nishioka K; Nakajima M
    Neuromodulation; 2015 Dec; 18(8):751-3. PubMed ID: 26047363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of Neurostimulation Technologies for the Management of Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review.
    Hofmeister M; Memedovich A; Brown S; Saini M; Dowsett LE; Lorenzetti DL; McCarron TL; MacKean G; Clement F
    Neuromodulation; 2020 Feb; 23(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 31310417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of a Multicenter, Prospective, Crossover, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Subperception Spinal Cord Stimulation at ≤1.2 kHz in Previously Implanted Subjects.
    North J; Loudermilk E; Lee A; Sachdeva H; Kaiafas D; Washabaugh E; Sheth S; Scowcroft J; Mekhail N; Lampert B; Yearwood T; Shaw E; Atallah J; McLeod C; Han J; Yu C; Sedrak M; Lucas R; Trobridge A; Hegarty J; Miller N; Chen L; Jain R
    Neuromodulation; 2020 Jan; 23(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 31265205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective Evaluation of Patient Usage of Above and Below Threshold Waveforms With Traditional Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices.
    Owusu S; Huynh A; Gruenthal E; Prusik J; Owusu-Sarpong S; Cherala R; Peng S; Pilitsis JG; McCallum SE
    Neuromodulation; 2017 Aug; 20(6):567-574. PubMed ID: 28699301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Protocol Using Human Spinal Cord Recording Comparing Safety, Efficacy, and Neurophysiological Responses Between Patients Being Treated With Evoked Compound Action Potential-Controlled Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation or Open-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (the Evoke Study).
    Levy R; Deer TR; Poree L; Rosen SM; Kapural L; Amirdelfan K; Soliday N; Leitner A; Mekhail N
    Neuromodulation; 2019 Apr; 22(3):317-326. PubMed ID: 30828946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spinal Cord Stimulation vs Conventional Therapies for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back and Leg Pain: A Systematic Review of Health Care Resource Utilization and Outcomes in the Last Decade.
    Odonkor CA; Orman S; Orhurhu V; Stone ME; Ahmed S
    Pain Med; 2019 Dec; 20(12):2479-2494. PubMed ID: 31498396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.