BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33751916)

  • 1. Evaluation of the presence of a central fusion lock effect on fixation disparity curve parameters in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
    Mirzaeian M; Hashemi H; Narooie-Noori F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Sardari S; Ostadimoghaddam H; Doostdar A; Khabazkhoob M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Jul; 104(5):617-624. PubMed ID: 33751916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement of Fixation Disparity Curve between Two Different Instruments.
    Hashemi H; Mirzaeian M; Narooie F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Ostadimoghaddam H; Sardari S; Khabazkhoob M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jun; 98(6):629-635. PubMed ID: 34081653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Pickwell LD; Gilchrist JM; Hesler J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of fixation disparity curve with the modified near Mallett unit and the wesson fixation disparity card in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Yekta AA; Ehsani M; Kundart J
    Strabismus; 2012 Dec; 20(4):166-74. PubMed ID: 23211142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of fixation disparity curve variables measured with the Sheedy Disparometer and the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card.
    Goss DA; Patel J
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):580-8. PubMed ID: 8539027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
    Karania R; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability of Associated Phoria Tests.
    Alhassan M; Hovis JK; Chou RB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 92(8):900-7. PubMed ID: 26099058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons of commercially available devices for the measurement of fixation disparity and associated phorias.
    Brownlee GA; Goss DA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 3403890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?
    Parmar KR; Dickinson C; Evans BJW
    J Optom; 2019; 12(4):222-231. PubMed ID: 31501055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of fixation disparity curve parameters with the modified near mallett unit in symptomatic and asymptomatic university students.
    Momeni Moghadam H; A Goss D; Yekta AA; Ehsani M
    Iran Red Crescent Med J; 2013 Nov; 15(11):e8572. PubMed ID: 24719687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of illumination and foveal fusion lock on clinical fixation disparity measurements with the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Wildsoet CF; Cameron KD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 4022649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of fixation disparity measured by saladin card and disparometer.
    Frantz KA; Elston P; Michalik E; Templeman CD; Zoltoski RK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 88(6):E733-41. PubMed ID: 21423065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fixation disparity measurements obtained with the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card and the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Dittemore D; Crum J; Kirschen D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 May; 70(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 8515972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differentiation of asymptomatic patients from symptomatic patients by the slope of the forced vergence fixation disparity curve.
    Teitelbaum BA; Micca PJ; Jones GD; Thurn M; Lee T
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Apr; 62(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 3993734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for measuring the proximity-fixation-disparity curve.
    Jaschinski W
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Sep; 21(5):368-75. PubMed ID: 11563424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Wesson and modified Sheedy fixation disparity tests. Do fixation disparity measures relate to normal binocular status?
    van Haeringen R; McClurg P; Cameron KD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 3627800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the aligning prism measured with the Mallett unit correlated with fusional vergence reserves?
    Conway ML; Thomas J; Subramanian A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42832. PubMed ID: 22905174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of disparometer fixation disparity curves as measured with and without the phoropter.
    Frantz KA; Scharre JE
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Feb; 67(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 2336250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fixation disparity.
    Dowley D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Feb; 66(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 2710517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurements of objective and subjective fixation disparity with and without a central fusion stimulus.
    Brautaset RL; Jennings JA
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Feb; 12(2):MT1-4. PubMed ID: 16449958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.