195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33753157)
1. Plan quality effects of maximum monitor unit constraints in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for central nervous system and skull base tumors.
Rao AD; Sun K; Zhu M; Mossahebi S; Sabouri P; Houser T; Jatczak J; Zakhary M; Regine WF; Miller RC; Bentzen S; Mishra MV
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Jul; 160():18-24. PubMed ID: 33753157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical Note: Plan-delivery-time constrained inverse optimization method with minimum-MU-per-energy-layer (MMPEL) for efficient pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Gao H; Clasie B; McDonald M; Langen KM; Liu T; Lin Y
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3892-3897. PubMed ID: 32614472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Multiple Beams on Plan Quality, Linear Energy Transfer Distribution, and Plan Robustness of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.
Shang H; Pu Y; Chen Z; Wang X; Yuan C; Jin X; Liu C
ACS Sens; 2021 Feb; 6(2):408-417. PubMed ID: 33125211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Spot Size and Beam-Shaping Devices on the Treatment Plan Quality for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.
Moteabbed M; Yock TI; Depauw N; Madden TM; Kooy HM; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 27084640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13512. PubMed ID: 34989458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spot scanning proton therapy for malignancies of the base of skull: treatment planning, acute toxicities, and preliminary clinical outcomes.
Grosshans DR; Zhu XR; Melancon A; Allen PK; Poenisch F; Palmer M; McAleer MF; McGovern SL; Gillin M; DeMonte F; Chang EL; Brown PD; Mahajan A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Nov; 90(3):540-6. PubMed ID: 25304948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of errors in spot size and spot position in robustly optimized pencil beam scanning proton-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) lung plans.
Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 22(7):147-154. PubMed ID: 34101334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Per-voxel constraints to minimize hot spots in linear energy transfer-guided robust optimization for base of skull head and neck cancer patients in IMPT.
Feng H; Shan J; Anderson JD; Wong WW; Schild SE; Foote RL; Patrick CL; Tinnon KB; Fatyga M; Bues M; Patel SH; Liu W
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):632-647. PubMed ID: 34843119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Universal Range Shifter and Range Compensator Can Enable Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Single-Energy Bragg Peak FLASH-RT Treatment Using Current Commercially Available Proton Systems.
Kang M; Wei S; Choi JI; Lin H; Simone CB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2022 May; 113(1):203-213. PubMed ID: 35101597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of spot parameters in pencil beam scanning treatment planning.
Kraan AC; Depauw N; Clasie B; Giunta M; Madden T; Kooy HM
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 29148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions.
Zeng C; Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Goldberg S; Niemierko A; Paganetti H; Efstathiou JA; Trofimov A
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051708. PubMed ID: 23635256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer.
Unkelbach J; Botas P; Giantsoudi D; Gorissen BL; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Dec; 96(5):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 27869082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of spot reduction on the effectiveness of rescanning in pencil beam scanned proton therapy for mobile tumours.
Bertschi S; Krieger M; Weber DC; Lomax AJ; van de Water S
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Nov; 67(21):. PubMed ID: 36179702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two methods for minimizing the effect of delayed charge on the dose delivered with a synchrotron based discrete spot scanning proton beam.
Whitaker TJ; Beltran C; Tryggestad E; Bues M; Kruse JJ; Remmes NB; Tasson A; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081703. PubMed ID: 25086513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Initial Report of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Posthysterectomy Patients With Gynecologic Cancer.
Lin LL; Kirk M; Scholey J; Taku N; Kiely JB; White B; Both S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):181-189. PubMed ID: 26372435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing biological effectiveness guided plan optimization strategies for cranial proton therapy: potential and challenges.
Hahn C; Heuchel L; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Plaude S; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Oct; 17(1):169. PubMed ID: 36273132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spot-Scanning Proton Arc (SPArc) Therapy: The First Robust and Delivery-Efficient Spot-Scanning Proton Arc Therapy.
Ding X; Li X; Zhang JM; Kabolizadeh P; Stevens C; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Dec; 96(5):1107-1116. PubMed ID: 27869083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning using single-field optimization: the impact of monitor unit constraints on plan quality.
Zhu XR; Sahoo N; Zhang X; Robertson D; Li H; Choi S; Lee AK; Gillin MT
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1210-9. PubMed ID: 20384258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
