These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33753230)
21. Searches for randomized controlled trials of drugs in MEDLINE and EMBASE using only generic drug names compared with searches applied in current practice in systematic reviews. Waffenschmidt S; Guddat C Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 26099486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews. Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Mast F; Kleijnen J Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):510-520. PubMed ID: 29073718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Systematic reviews and tech mining: A methodological comparison with case study. Anderson PF; Shannon C; Bickett S; Doucette J; Herring P; Kepsel A; Lyons T; McLachlan S; Wu L Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):540-550. PubMed ID: 30129708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effectiveness of different databases in identifying studies for systematic reviews: experience from the WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality. Betrán AP; Say L; Gülmezoglu AM; Allen T; Hampson L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jan; 5(1):6. PubMed ID: 15679886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Full-text and bibliographic database searching in the health sciences: an exploratory study comparing CCML and MEDLINE. Gallagher KE; Hulbert LA; Sullivan CP Med Ref Serv Q; 1990; 9(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 10110455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Locating qualitative studies in dementia on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO: A comparison of search strategies. Rogers M; Bethel A; Abbott R Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):579-586. PubMed ID: 29080334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Critical Review of Search Strategies Used in Recent Systematic Reviews Published in Selected Prosthodontic and Implant-Related Journals: Are Systematic Reviews Actually Systematic? Layton D Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 28085971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews. Thomas J; McDonald S; Noel-Storr A; Shemilt I; Elliott J; Mavergames C; Marshall IJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():140-151. PubMed ID: 33171275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review. Gargon E; Williamson PR; Clarke M BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Mar; 15():26. PubMed ID: 25888523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. Sampson M; McGowan J; Cogo E; Grimshaw J; Moher D; Lefebvre C J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):944-52. PubMed ID: 19230612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Exploring the evidence: the challenges of searching for research on acupuncture. Pilkington K; Richardson J J Altern Complement Med; 2004 Jun; 10(3):587-90. PubMed ID: 15253867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Literature search parameters marginally improved the pooled estimate accuracy for ultrasound in detecting deep venous thrombosis. Kassaï B; Sonié S; Shah NR; Boissel JP J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 59(7):710-4. PubMed ID: 16765274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Topfer LA; Parada A; Menon D; Noorani H; Perras C; Serra-Prat M Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 10507189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Hand searching for controlled clinical trials in German surgical journals. A contribution to evidence-based surgery]. Blümle A; Antes G; Diener MK Chirurg; 2007 Nov; 78(11):1052-7. PubMed ID: 17622501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? Wilkins T; Gillies RA; Davies K Can Fam Physician; 2005 Jun; 51(6):848-9. PubMed ID: 16926954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Medline/full-text research project. McKinin EJ; Sievert M; Johnson ED; Mitchell JA J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1991 May; 42(4):297-307. PubMed ID: 10111576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Identifying diagnostic accuracy studies in EMBASE. Bachmann LM; Estermann P; Kronenberg C; ter Riet G J Med Libr Assoc; 2003 Jul; 91(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 12883560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using the full PICO model as a search tool for systematic reviews resulted in lower recall for some PICO elements. Frandsen TF; Bruun Nielsen MF; Lindhardt CL; Eriksen MB J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():69-75. PubMed ID: 32679315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. PubMed coverage varied across specialties and over time: a large-scale study of included studies in Cochrane reviews. Frandsen TF; Eriksen MB; Hammer DMG; Christensen JB J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():59-66. PubMed ID: 31051247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A mapping exercise using automated techniques to develop a search strategy to identify systematic review tools. Sutton A; O'Keefe H; Johnson EE; Marshall C Res Synth Methods; 2023 Nov; 14(6):874-881. PubMed ID: 37669905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]