164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33753661)
1. Qualitative and morphological evaluation of the mandibular bone using computed tomography.
Priyadarshini SR; Sahoo PK; Niyogi S; Patnaik S; Bhuyan SK
Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 33753661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variations in bone quantity in the posterior mandible: a cross-sectional cone beam computed tomographic study.
Safi Y; Amid R; Alizad-Rahvar M
Gen Dent; 2022; 70(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 34978983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation the anterior mandibular lingual concavity by using cone-beam computed tomography.
Çitir M; Gunduz K; Kasap P
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2021; 80(4):916-922. PubMed ID: 33084005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrospective study of the bone morphology in the posterior mandibular region. Evaluation of the prevalence and the degree of lingual concavity and their possible complications.
Herranz-Aparicio J; Marques J; Almendros-Marqués N; Gay-Escoda C
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2016 Nov; 21(6):e731-e736. PubMed ID: 27694785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography.
Swasty D; Lee JS; Huang JC; Maki K; Gansky SA; Hatcher D; Miller AJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):491-500. PubMed ID: 19231771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influential Factors in Buccal and Lingual Plate Perforation around Dental Implants Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Vasegh Z; Safi Y; Amid R; Ahsaie MG; Khalife Z; Amiri MJ
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2022; 32(2):7-16. PubMed ID: 35695622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT.
Nickenig HJ; Wichmann M; Eitner S; Zöller JE; Kreppel M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 25547216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between Cortical Bone Thickness and Cancellous Bone Density at Dental Implant Sites in the Jawbone.
Wang SH; Shen YW; Fuh LJ; Peng SL; Tsai MT; Huang HL; Hsu JT
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32957724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Available bone morphology and status of neural structures in the mandibular interforaminal region: three-dimensional analysis of anatomical structures.
Goller Bulut D; Köse E
Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Nov; 40(11):1243-1252. PubMed ID: 29766231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative Evaluation of Bone-Related Factors at the Implant Site by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Vasegh Z; Safi Y; Amid R; Ahsaie MG; Amiri MJ; Minooei Z
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2022; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 35377992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the distribution characteristics of the mandibular lingual foramen and its potential risks during implant surgery using cone-beam computed tomography a cross-sectional, retrospective study.
Liao Q; Chen Y; Liao Y; Lian K
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Dec; 24(6):862-870. PubMed ID: 36208069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Analysis of the Posterior and Anterior Mandibular Lingual Concavity for Dental Implant Patients.
Yoon TY; Patel M; Michaud RA; Manibo AM
J Oral Implantol; 2017 Feb; 43(1):12-18. PubMed ID: 27759505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3-D mapping of cortical bone thickness in subjects with different face form and arch form: A CBCT analysis.
Chaturvedi S; Alfarsi MA
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 May; 22(5):616-625. PubMed ID: 31089015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants.
Parnia F; Fard EM; Mahboub F; Hafezeqoran A; Gavgani FE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e32-6. PubMed ID: 20123366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between alveolar bone thickness, tooth root morphology, and sagittal skeletal pattern : A cone beam computed tomography study.
Coşkun İ; Kaya B
J Orofac Orthop; 2019 May; 80(3):144-158. PubMed ID: 30980091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Chan HL; Benavides E; Yeh CY; Fu JH; Rudek IE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 20653440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Fayed MM; Pazera P; Katsaros C
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
