These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3375480)

  • 1. [Mammographic diagnosis based on oblique projection. Personal experience].
    Gozzi G; Vidali C; Polonio G; Cressa C; Sabella M
    Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 3375480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation into why two-view mammography is better than one-view in breast cancer screening.
    Hackshaw AK; Wald NJ; Michell MJ; Field S; Wilson AR
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Jun; 55(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 10873691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of step-oblique mammography for confirmation and localization of densities seen on only one standard mammographic view.
    Pearson KL; Sickles EA; Frankel SD; Leung JW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar; 174(3):745-52. PubMed ID: 10701619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast.
    Sickles EA; Weber WN; Galvin HB; Ominsky SH; Sollitto RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Dec; 147(6):1149-53. PubMed ID: 3490749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: recall rates using two views compared with the oblique view alone.
    Haiart DC; Kirkpatrick AE
    Br J Clin Pract; 1990 Jun; 44(6):213-5. PubMed ID: 2206812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Second-screening mammography: one versus two views per breast.
    Ikeda DM; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 3406393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The oblique projection in the radiologic study of the breast].
    Mancuso S; Ottolenghi G
    Minerva Ginecol; 1989 Jul; 41(7):325-8. PubMed ID: 2608201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DOES ONE SIZE FIT ALL? COST UTILITY ANALYSES OF ALTERNATIVE MAMMOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP SCHEDULES, BY RISK OF RECURRENCE.
    Bessen T; Keefe DM; Karnon J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(5):281-8. PubMed ID: 26654334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-view mammographic screening?
    Libshitz HL; Fetouh S; Isley J; Lester RG
    Radiology; 1976 Sep; 120(3):719-22. PubMed ID: 948609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer detection: one versus two views.
    Bassett LW; Bunnell DH; Jahanshahi R; Gold RH; Arndt RD; Linsman J
    Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 3628795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Efficiency and practicability of the oblique mediolateral view as one-view mammography (author's transl)].
    Hüppe JR; Schneider HJ
    Radiologe; 1977 May; 17(5):211-2. PubMed ID: 877268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast radiography using the oblique projection.
    Bassett LW; Gold RH
    Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):585-7. PubMed ID: 6622708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography for screening high-risk patients for cancer: value of including a lateral projection.
    Kreager JA; Kornguth PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 8310913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compression force and radiation dose in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Waade GG; Sanderud A; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():41-46. PubMed ID: 28189207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Additional images and subsequent palpation--indispensable conditions for efficient diagnosis using mammography].
    Hüppe JR
    Z Lymphol; 1986 Dec; 10(2):63-76. PubMed ID: 3825243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Film-screen mammography: comparison of views.
    Bassett LW; Bunnell DH; Gold RH; Jahanshahi R
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 81(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 2738948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic follow-up of nonpalpable low-suspicion breast abnormalities: one versus two views.
    Datoc PD; Hayes CW; Conway WF; Bosch HA; Neal MP
    Radiology; 1991 Aug; 180(2):387-91. PubMed ID: 2068300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oblique-view mammography: adequacy for screening. Work in progress.
    Muir BB; Kirkpatrick AE; Roberts MM; Duffy SW
    Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 6701330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.