These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33755518)

  • 41. Subclassification estimation of the weighted average treatment effect.
    Choi BY
    Biom J; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1706-1728. PubMed ID: 34270815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Adjustment for Baseline Covariates to Increase Efficiency in RCTs with Binary Endpoint: A Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches.
    Berchialla P; Sciannameo V; Urru S; Lanera C; Azzolina D; Gregori D; Baldi I
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Models for the propensity score that contemplate the positivity assumption and their application to missing data and causality.
    Molina J; Sued M; Valdora M
    Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(24):3503-3518. PubMed ID: 29873100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Robust inference on the average treatment effect using the outcome highly adaptive lasso.
    Ju C; Benkeser D; van der Laan MJ
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 31350906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Stuart EA; Lee BK; Leacy FP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S84-S90.e1. PubMed ID: 23849158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Targeted Learning with an Undersmoothed Lasso Propensity Score Model for Large-Scale Covariate Adjustment in Healthcare Database Studies.
    Wyss R; van der Laan M; Gruber S; Shi X; Lee H; Dutcher SK; Nelson JC; Toh S; Russo M; Wang SV; Desai RJ; Lin KJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38517025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Statistical Mediation Analysis for Models with a Binary Mediator and a Binary Outcome: the Differences Between Causal and Traditional Mediation Analysis.
    Rijnhart JJM; Valente MJ; Smyth HL; MacKinnon DP
    Prev Sci; 2023 Apr; 24(3):408-418. PubMed ID: 34782926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. High-dimensional generalized propensity score with application to omics data.
    Gao Q; Zhang Y; Liang J; Sun H; Wang T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34410351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Survival mediation analysis with the death-truncated mediator: The completeness of the survival mediation parameter.
    Tai AS; Tsai CA; Lin SH
    Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(17):3953-3974. PubMed ID: 34111901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Understanding and diagnosing the potential for bias when using machine learning methods with doubly robust causal estimators.
    Bahamyirou A; Blais L; Forget A; Schnitzer ME
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1637-1650. PubMed ID: 29717941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Variable selection for propensity score models when estimating treatment effects on multiple outcomes: a simulation study.
    Wyss R; Girman CJ; LoCasale RJ; Brookhart AM; Stürmer T
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Jan; 22(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 23070806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Comparison of Latent Variable Propensity Score Models to Traditional Propensity Score Models under Conditions of Covariate Unreliability.
    Whittaker TA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(4):625-646. PubMed ID: 31530179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Distribution-free mediation analysis for nonlinear models with confounding.
    Albert JM
    Epidemiology; 2012 Nov; 23(6):879-88. PubMed ID: 23007042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Stein-like estimators for causal mediation analysis in randomized trials.
    Ginestet CE; Emsley R; Landau S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1129-1148. PubMed ID: 31172884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Weighted estimation for confounded binary outcomes subject to misclassification.
    Gravel CA; Platt RW
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):425-436. PubMed ID: 29082530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Visualization tool of variable selection in bias-variance tradeoff for inverse probability weights.
    Yu YH; Filion KB; Bodnar LM; Brooks MM; Platt RW; Himes KP; Naimi AI
    Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 41():56-59. PubMed ID: 31982245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Linear high-dimensional mediation models adjusting for confounders using propensity score method.
    Luo L; Yan Y; Cui Y; Yuan X; Yu Z
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():961148. PubMed ID: 36299590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Propensity score weighting methods for causal subgroup analysis with time-to-event outcomes.
    Yang S; Zhou R; Li F; Thomas LE
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Oct; 32(10):1919-1935. PubMed ID: 37559475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Deep propensity network using a sparse autoencoder for estimation of treatment effects.
    Ghosh S; Bian J; Guo Y; Prosperi M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1197-1206. PubMed ID: 33594415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.