These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33755535)

  • 1. Positively and Negatively Autocorrelated Environmental Fluctuations Have Opposing Effects on Species Coexistence.
    Schreiber SJ
    Am Nat; 2021 Apr; 197(4):405-414. PubMed ID: 33755535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When rarity has costs: coexistence under positive frequency-dependence and environmental stochasticity.
    Schreiber SJ; Yamamichi M; Strauss SY
    Ecology; 2019 Jul; 100(7):e02664. PubMed ID: 30773621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coexistence of annual plants: generalist seed predation weakens the storage effect.
    Kuang JJ; Chesson P
    Ecology; 2009 Jan; 90(1):170-82. PubMed ID: 19294923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of immigration and environmental variability on the persistence of an inferior competitor.
    Long ZT; Petchey OL; Holt RD
    Ecol Lett; 2007 Jul; 10(7):574-85. PubMed ID: 17542936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Persistence in fluctuating environments for interacting structured populations.
    Roth G; Schreiber SJ
    J Math Biol; 2014 Nov; 69(5):1267-317. PubMed ID: 24311028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effects of Dynamical Rates on Species Coexistence in a Variable Environment: The Paradox of the Plankton Revisited.
    Li L; Chesson P
    Am Nat; 2016 Aug; 188(2):E46-58. PubMed ID: 27420794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weak effect of climate variability on coexistence in a sagebrush steppe community.
    Adler PB; HilleRisLambers J; Levine JM
    Ecology; 2009 Dec; 90(12):3303-12. PubMed ID: 20120800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linking metacommunity paradigms to spatial coexistence mechanisms.
    Shoemaker LG; Melbourne BA
    Ecology; 2016 Sep; 97(9):2436-2446. PubMed ID: 27859071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applying modern coexistence theory to priority effects.
    Grainger TN; Letten AD; Gilbert B; Fukami T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Mar; 116(13):6205-6210. PubMed ID: 30850518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The competitive exclusion principle in stochastic environments.
    Hening A; Nguyen DH
    J Math Biol; 2020 Apr; 80(5):1323-1351. PubMed ID: 31919652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stabilization of species coexistence in spatial models through the aggregation-segregation effect generated by local dispersal and nonspecific local interactions.
    Detto M; Muller-Landau HC
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Dec; 112():97-108. PubMed ID: 27609405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How the spatial scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity interact to affect coexistence.
    Snyder RE; Chesson P
    Am Nat; 2004 Nov; 164(5):633-50. PubMed ID: 15540153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A framework for linking competitor ecological differences to coexistence.
    Ousterhout BH; Serrano M; Bried JT; Siepielski AM
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Oct; 88(10):1534-1548. PubMed ID: 31222738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The 'filtering' metaphor revisited: competition and environment jointly structure invasibility and coexistence.
    Germain RM; Mayfield MM; Gilbert B
    Biol Lett; 2018 Aug; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 30135118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluctuation-independent niche differentiation and relative non-linearity drive coexistence in a species-rich grassland.
    Zepeda V; Martorell C
    Ecology; 2019 Aug; 100(8):e02726. PubMed ID: 30985909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temperature fluctuation facilitates coexistence of competing species in experimental microbial communities.
    Jiang L; Morin PJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jul; 76(4):660-8. PubMed ID: 17584371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental variation, stochastic extinction, and competitive coexistence.
    Adler PB; Drake JM
    Am Nat; 2008 Nov; 172(5):186-95. PubMed ID: 18817458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Negative frequency-dependent growth underlies the stable coexistence of two cosmopolitan aquatic plants.
    Armitage DW; Jones SE
    Ecology; 2019 May; 100(5):e02657. PubMed ID: 30770565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymmetric relationships and their effects on coexistence.
    Albert PJ; Reuman DC
    Ecol Lett; 2024 Jan; 27(1):e14334. PubMed ID: 37957830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The risk of competitive exclusion during evolutionary branching: effects of resource variability, correlation and autocorrelation.
    Johansson J; Ripa J; Kuckländer N
    Theor Popul Biol; 2010 Mar; 77(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 19895825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.