These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33756426)

  • 1. Comparison of automated vehicle struck-from-behind crash rates with national rates using naturalistic data.
    Goodall NJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 May; 154():106056. PubMed ID: 33756426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advancing investigation of automated vehicle crashes using text analytics of crash narratives and Bayesian analysis.
    Lee S; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106932. PubMed ID: 36580765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of pre-crash scenarios and contributing factors for autonomous vehicle crashes at intersections.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Liu S; Yu C; Glaser Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107383. PubMed ID: 37984113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S112-S118. PubMed ID: 31381436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploratory analysis of automated vehicle crashes in California: A text analytics & hierarchical Bayesian heterogeneity-based approach.
    Boggs AM; Wali B; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Feb; 135():105354. PubMed ID: 31790970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of crash rates and rear-end striking crashes among novice teens and experienced adults using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Seacrist T; Belwadi A; Prabahar A; Chamberlain S; Megariotis J; Loeb H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():48-52. PubMed ID: 27586102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety in higher level automated vehicles: Investigating edge cases in crashes of vehicles equipped with automated driving systems.
    Moradloo N; Mahdinia I; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107607. PubMed ID: 38723333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Waymo simulated driving behavior in reconstructed fatal crashes within an autonomous vehicle operating domain.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Daniel T; Alderson C; Ogle A; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106454. PubMed ID: 34700249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the collective safety of automated vehicle groups: A duration modeling approach of accumulated distances between crashes.
    Sohrabi S; Lord D; Dadashova B; Mannering F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Apr; 198():107454. PubMed ID: 38290409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How instantaneous driving behavior contributes to crashes at intersections: Extracting useful information from connected vehicle message data.
    Arvin R; Kamrani M; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jun; 127():118-133. PubMed ID: 30851563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rage against the machine? Google's self-driving cars versus human drivers.
    Teoh ER; Kidd DG
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():57-60. PubMed ID: 29203024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Association between Regional Environmental Factors and Road Trauma Rates: A Geospatial Analysis of 10 Years of Road Traffic Crashes in British Columbia, Canada.
    Brubacher JR; Chan H; Erdelyi S; Schuurman N; Amram O
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153742. PubMed ID: 27099930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is vehicle automation enough to prevent crashes? Role of traffic operations in automated driving environments for traffic safety.
    Jeong E; Oh C; Lee S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():115-124. PubMed ID: 28499140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Autonomous driving testing scenario generation based on in-depth vehicle-to-powered two-wheeler crash data in China.
    Wang X; Peng Y; Xu T; Xu Q; Wu X; Xiang G; Yi S; Wang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106812. PubMed ID: 36054982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical analysis of the patterns and characteristics of connected and autonomous vehicle involved crashes.
    Xu C; Ding Z; Wang C; Li Z
    J Safety Res; 2019 Dec; 71():41-47. PubMed ID: 31862043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An epidemiological study of roadway fatalities related to farm vehicles: United States, 1988 to 1993.
    Gerberich SG; Robertson LS; Gibson RW; Renier C
    J Occup Environ Med; 1996 Nov; 38(11):1135-40. PubMed ID: 8941903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing rear-end crash potential in urban locations based on vehicle-by-vehicle interactions, geometric characteristics and operational conditions.
    Dimitriou L; Stylianou K; Abdel-Aty MA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():221-235. PubMed ID: 29502853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of collision types between automated and conventional vehicles using Bayesian probabilistic inferences.
    Novat N; Kidando E; Kutela B; Kitali AE
    J Safety Res; 2023 Feb; 84():251-260. PubMed ID: 36868654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Looking back in the rearview: Insights into Queensland's rear-end crashes.
    Swain R; Larue GS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(2):138-146. PubMed ID: 38165203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.