These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 337567)

  • 1. [The effect of resuscitation on the results obtained in identification of enterobacteriaceae by the API system (author's transl)].
    de Blaauw LH; de Pijper FW
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1977 Dec; 102(23):1376-9. PubMed ID: 337567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Use of the API 20E system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae (six hours) (author's transl)].
    Pinon G; Loulergue J; Quentin R; Darchis JP; Prieur D; Vargues R
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1979; 37(4):221-3. PubMed ID: 525850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Micro-ID system (author's transl)].
    Peuckert W; Pelz K
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Aug; 247(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 6999799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A study on the bacteriological aspect of fresh beef. II. Effect of storage of carcases in slaughter-houses (author's transl)].
    Mulder SJ; Krol B
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1976 Jun; 101(11):594-8. PubMed ID: 1273818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of Micro-ID, API 20 E and a conventional technique for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Gregersen T; Persson B; Jensen MM
    Nord Vet Med; 1980 May; 32(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 6992099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term preservation of mouse spermatozoa after freeze-drying and freezing without cryoprotection.
    Ward MA; Kaneko T; Kusakabe H; Biggers JD; Whittingham DG; Yanagimachi R
    Biol Reprod; 2003 Dec; 69(6):2100-8. PubMed ID: 12930716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative studies with the rapid KCN-test for Enterobacteriaceae according to Cahan, Sechter and Ohad (author's transl)].
    Höhne C
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1976 Aug; 235(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 790855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of two miniaturized systems widely used in the laboratories for the identification of the "Enterobacteriaceae" (author's transl)].
    Santini GF; Crovatto M; Chiaradia V; Marchi MP
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1979 Mar; 15(1):78-102. PubMed ID: 396548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin.
    Kulinich LI; Fish NG; Mazitova OP; Dratvin SA; Birger MO
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Problems in identification of bacteria--on the API20 E system (author's transl)].
    Mitsuyama S; Takakuwa M; Takahashi M; Tsutsui T
    Rinsho Byori; 1980 Mar; 28(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 6990060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [An evaluation of the PATHOTEC system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae (author's tranls)].
    Gregersen T; Halgaard C
    Nord Vet Med; 1976 Jun; 28(6):316-21. PubMed ID: 781615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [On the contamination of the citric acid fermentation. I. The contamination by representatives of Enterobacteriaceae (author's transl)].
    Leopold H; Trefil L
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Naturwiss; 1979; 134(7):604-10. PubMed ID: 398647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative investigations of commercial systems available for identification on Enterobacteriaceae (author's transl)].
    Bisgaard M; Gregersen T; Petersen E
    Nord Vet Med; 1974 Mar; 26(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 4598278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Minibact, a new system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison of Minibact, Micro-ID and API 20E with a conventional method as reference.
    Kjaeldgaard P; Nissen B; Lange N; Laursen H
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Apr; 94(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 3524112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of API-10s and Minitek with conventional biochemical tests (author's transl)].
    Stanek G; Hirschl A; Rotter M
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Feb; 246(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 6999781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A clinical evaluation of the API microtube system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Brooks KA; Jens M; Sodeman TM
    Am J Med Technol; 1974 Feb; 40(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 4591715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of the rapid enterotube method for the identification of enterobacteria].
    Nicoletti P
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1974 Jun; 10(2):254-65. PubMed ID: 4617241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the MIC 2000 enteric media with API 20 E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Courcol RJ; Husson MO; Izard DE; Martin GR
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Sep; 252(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 6758421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.