BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33759124)

  • 1. Negative Image-Based Screening: Rigid Docking Using Cavity Information.
    Postila PA; Kurkinen ST; Pentikäinen OT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():125-140. PubMed ID: 33759124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative Image-Based Rescoring: Using Cavity Information to Improve Docking Screening.
    Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():141-154. PubMed ID: 33759125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Practical Perspective: The Effect of Ligand Conformers on the Negative Image-Based Screening.
    Ahinko M; Kurkinen ST; Niinivehmas SP; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jun; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 31174295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ligand-Enhanced Negative Images Optimized for Docking Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 35887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Getting Docking into Shape Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Lätti S; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Aug; 59(8):3584-3599. PubMed ID: 31290660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving Docking Performance Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Niinivehmas S; Ahinko M; Lätti S; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Front Pharmacol; 2018; 9():260. PubMed ID: 29632488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of Cavity-Based Negative Images to Boost Docking Enrichment in Virtual Screening.
    Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Feb; 62(4):1100-1112. PubMed ID: 35133138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applications of the NRGsuite and the Molecular Docking Software FlexAID in Computational Drug Discovery and Design.
    Morency LP; Gaudreault F; Najmanovich R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():367-388. PubMed ID: 29594781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structure-based virtual screening for novel ligands.
    Pitt WR; Calmiano MD; Kroeplien B; Taylor RD; Turner JP; King MA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1008():501-19. PubMed ID: 23729265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel insights of structure-based modeling for RNA-targeted drug discovery.
    Chen L; Calin GA; Zhang S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2741-53. PubMed ID: 22947071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comprehensive assessment of flexible-ligand docking algorithms: current effectiveness and challenges.
    Huang SY
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):982-994. PubMed ID: 28334282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.
    Neves MA; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):675-86. PubMed ID: 22569591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binding Mode Prediction and Virtual Screening Applications by Covalent Docking.
    Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():73-88. PubMed ID: 33759121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fragment- and negative image-based screening of phosphodiesterase 10A inhibitors.
    Jokinen EM; Postila PA; Ahinko M; Niinivehmas S; Pentikäinen OT
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2019 Oct; 94(4):1799-1812. PubMed ID: 31260165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Virtual Screening Strategy to Identify Retinoic Acid-Related Orphan Receptor γt Modulators.
    Jokinen EM; Niemeläinen M; Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Lätti S; Postila PA; Pentikäinen OT; Niinivehmas SP
    Molecules; 2023 Apr; 28(8):. PubMed ID: 37110655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of the CXCR4 structure on docking-based virtual screening of HIV entry inhibitors.
    Planesas JM; Pérez-Nueno VI; Borrell JI; Teixidó J
    J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Sep; 38():123-36. PubMed ID: 23079643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Local Interaction Density (LID), a Fast and Efficient Tool to Prioritize Docking Poses.
    Jacquemard C; Tran-Nguyen VK; Drwal MN; Rognan D; Kellenberger E
    Molecules; 2019 Jul; 24(14):. PubMed ID: 31323745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.
    Kadukova M; Grudinin S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):151-162. PubMed ID: 28913782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.