These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33759124)

  • 21. Efficient virtual screening using multiple protein conformations described as negative images of the ligand-binding site.
    Virtanen SI; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 20504004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Charting a Path to Success in Virtual Screening.
    Forli S
    Molecules; 2015 Oct; 20(10):18732-58. PubMed ID: 26501243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Li Q; Shah S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1558():111-124. PubMed ID: 28150235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Docking and Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery.
    Kontoyianni M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1647():255-266. PubMed ID: 28809009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
    Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Docking software performance in protein-glycosaminoglycan systems.
    Uciechowska-Kaczmarzyk U; Chauvot de Beauchene I; Samsonov SA
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jul; 90():42-50. PubMed ID: 30959268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Molecular fields in ligand discovery.
    Gane PJ; Chan AW
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1008():479-99. PubMed ID: 23729264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. DockBench: An Integrated Informatic Platform Bridging the Gap between the Robust Validation of Docking Protocols and Virtual Screening Simulations.
    Cuzzolin A; Sturlese M; Malvacio I; Ciancetta A; Moro S
    Molecules; 2015 May; 20(6):9977-93. PubMed ID: 26035098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. LIGSIFT: an open-source tool for ligand structural alignment and virtual screening.
    Roy A; Skolnick J
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 25336501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fast Rescoring Protocols to Improve the Performance of Structure-Based Virtual Screening Performed on Protein-Protein Interfaces.
    Singh N; Chaput L; Villoutreix BO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Aug; 60(8):3910-3934. PubMed ID: 32786511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing and improving the performance of consensus docking strategies using the DockBox package.
    Preto J; Gentile F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Sep; 33(9):817-829. PubMed ID: 31578656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ligand-based virtual screening approach using a new scoring function.
    Hamza A; Wei NN; Zhan CG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):963-74. PubMed ID: 22486340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Structure-Based Virtual Screening of Commercially Available Compound Libraries.
    Kireev D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1439():65-76. PubMed ID: 27316988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of virtual high-throughput screening methods for the identification of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.
    Niinivehmas SP; Virtanen SI; Lehtonen JV; Postila PA; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1353-63. PubMed ID: 21591817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ultrafast protein structure-based virtual screening with Panther.
    Niinivehmas SP; Salokas K; Lätti S; Raunio H; Pentikäinen OT
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Oct; 29(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 26407559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MedusaDock 2.0: Efficient and Accurate Protein-Ligand Docking With Constraints.
    Wang J; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2509-2515. PubMed ID: 30946779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Extensive consensus docking evaluation for ligand pose prediction and virtual screening studies.
    Tuccinardi T; Poli G; Romboli V; Giordano A; Martinelli A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2980-6. PubMed ID: 25211541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.