These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33759124)

  • 41. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
    Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. SEABED: Small molEcule activity scanner weB servicE baseD.
    Fenollosa C; Otón M; Andrio P; Cortés J; Orozco M; Goñi JR
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 31(5):773-5. PubMed ID: 25348211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Structure-based virtual screening of MT2 melatonin receptor: influence of template choice and structural refinement.
    Pala D; Beuming T; Sherman W; Lodola A; Rivara S; Mor M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):821-35. PubMed ID: 23541165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ligand aligning method for molecular docking: alignment of property-weighted vectors.
    Joung JY; Nam KY; Cho KH; No KT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):984-95. PubMed ID: 22471323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. MOLS 2.0: software package for peptide modeling and protein-ligand docking.
    Paul DS; Gautham N
    J Mol Model; 2016 Oct; 22(10):239. PubMed ID: 27638416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.
    Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 30084081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Virtual screening data fusion using both structure- and ligand-based methods.
    Svensson F; Karlén A; Sköld C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 22148635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Biased Docking for Protein-Ligand Pose Prediction.
    Arcon JP; Turjanski AG; Martí MA; Forli S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():39-72. PubMed ID: 33759120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Performance of protein-ligand docking with simulated chemical shift perturbations.
    Ten Brink T; Aguirre C; Exner TE; Krimm I
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Feb; 55(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 25357133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Protein structure-based drug design: from docking to molecular dynamics.
    Śledź P; Caflisch A
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2018 Feb; 48():93-102. PubMed ID: 29149726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Building shape-focused pharmacophore models for effective docking screening.
    Moyano-Gómez P; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    J Cheminform; 2024 Aug; 16(1):97. PubMed ID: 39123240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. New additions to the ClusPro server motivated by CAPRI.
    Vajda S; Yueh C; Beglov D; Bohnuud T; Mottarella SE; Xia B; Hall DR; Kozakov D
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):435-444. PubMed ID: 27936493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Exploration of the structural requirements of HIV-protease inhibitors using pharmacophore, virtual screening and molecular docking approaches for lead identification.
    Islam MA; Pillay TS
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Mar; 56():20-30. PubMed ID: 25541527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fully Flexible Docking of Medium Sized Ligand Libraries with RosettaLigand.
    DeLuca S; Khar K; Meiler J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132508. PubMed ID: 26207742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Discovery of novel tubulin inhibitors via structure-based hierarchical virtual screening.
    Cao R; Liu M; Yin M; Liu Q; Wang Y; Huang N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2730-40. PubMed ID: 22992059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Molecular docking to flexible targets.
    Sørensen J; Demir Ö; Swift RV; Feher VA; Amaro RE
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1215():445-69. PubMed ID: 25330975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Docking challenge: protein sampling and molecular docking performance.
    Elokely KM; Doerksen RJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1934-45. PubMed ID: 23530568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. New approaches for computing ligand-receptor binding kinetics.
    Bruce NJ; Ganotra GK; Kokh DB; Sadiq SK; Wade RC
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2018 Apr; 49():1-10. PubMed ID: 29132080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.