217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33759135)
1. MDock: A Suite for Molecular Inverse Docking and Target Prediction.
Ma Z; Zou X
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():313-322. PubMed ID: 33759135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple grid arrangement improves ligand docking with unknown binding sites: Application to the inverse docking problem.
Ban T; Ohue M; Akiyama Y
Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Apr; 73():139-146. PubMed ID: 29482137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MDockPeP: A Web Server for Blind Prediction of Protein-Peptide Complex Structures.
Xu X; Zou X
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2165():259-272. PubMed ID: 32621230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HybridDock: A Hybrid Protein-Ligand Docking Protocol Integrating Protein- and Ligand-Based Approaches.
Huang SY; Li M; Wang J; Pan Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1078-87. PubMed ID: 26317502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protein-Ligand Docking in Drug Design: Performance Assessment and Binding-Pose Selection.
Ballante F
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1824():67-88. PubMed ID: 30039402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Facing the challenges of structure-based target prediction by inverse virtual screening.
Schomburg KT; Bietz S; Briem H; Henzler AM; Urbaczek S; Rarey M
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1676-86. PubMed ID: 24851945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.
Forli S; Huey R; Pique ME; Sanner MF; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ
Nat Protoc; 2016 May; 11(5):905-19. PubMed ID: 27077332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.
Baek M; Shin WH; Chung HW; Seok C
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jul; 31(7):653-666. PubMed ID: 28623486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PSOVina: The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
Ng MC; Fong S; Siu SW
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541007. PubMed ID: 25800162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applications of the NRGsuite and the Molecular Docking Software FlexAID in Computational Drug Discovery and Design.
Morency LP; Gaudreault F; Najmanovich R
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():367-388. PubMed ID: 29594781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. COACH-D: improved protein-ligand binding sites prediction with refined ligand-binding poses through molecular docking.
Wu Q; Peng Z; Zhang Y; Yang J
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jul; 46(W1):W438-W442. PubMed ID: 29846643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Binding Mode Prediction and Virtual Screening Applications by Covalent Docking.
Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():73-88. PubMed ID: 33759121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HarmonyDOCK: the structural analysis of poses in protein-ligand docking.
Plewczynski D; Philips A; Von Grotthuss M; Rychlewski L; Ginalski K
J Comput Biol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 21091053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting protein-ligand binding modes for CELPP and GC3: workflows and insight.
Xu X; Ma Z; Duan R; Zou X
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Mar; 33(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 30689079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
