203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33759660)
1. New approach for selecting a suitable recycling collection program for recovered paper and pulp recyclables using AHP-TOPSIS techniques.
Bafail OA; Abdulaal RM
Waste Manag Res; 2021 Nov; 39(11):1406-1413. PubMed ID: 33759660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model.
Aghajani Mir M; Taherei Ghazvinei P; Sulaiman NM; Basri NE; Saheri S; Mahmood NZ; Jahan A; Begum RA; Aghamohammadi N
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():109-15. PubMed ID: 26496840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using multi-criteria decision making for selection of the optimal strategy for municipal solid waste management.
Jovanovic S; Savic S; Jovicic N; Boskovic G; Djordjevic Z
Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):884-95. PubMed ID: 27354012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health-Care Waste Treatment Technology Selection Using the Interval 2-Tuple Induced TOPSIS Method.
Lu C; You JX; Liu HC; Li P
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 27271652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
Onüt S; Soner S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of Delphi-AHP methods to select the priorities of WEEE for recycling in a waste management decision-making tool.
Kim M; Jang YC; Lee S
J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():941-8. PubMed ID: 23892135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sanitary landfill site selection by integrating AHP and FTOPSIS with GIS: a case study of Memari Municipality, India.
Ali SA; Parvin F; Al-Ansari N; Pham QB; Ahmad A; Raj MS; Anh DT; Ba LH; Thai VN
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(6):7528-7550. PubMed ID: 33034852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. More than just organics: Boosting separate collection of dry recyclables with door-to-door bio-waste collection in EU capitals.
Abeshev K; Koppenborg F
Waste Manag; 2023 Apr; 161():156-165. PubMed ID: 36878042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Solid waste management scenarios for Cetinje in Montenegro.
Yetis U; Jakobsen JB; Dilek FB; Kıyık E; Mugoša S; Novović J; Kerestecioglu M
Waste Manag Res; 2015 May; 33(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 25762565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the expansion of the selective collection in the sorting infrastructure of waste pickers' organizations: A case study of 16 Brazilian cities.
Meira de Sousa Dutra R; Harue Yamane L; Ribeiro Siman R
Waste Manag; 2018 Jul; 77():50-58. PubMed ID: 30008414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrated TOPSIS-COV approach for selecting a sustainable PET waste management technology: A case study in Qatar.
Al-Thani NA; Al-Ansari T; Haouari M
Heliyon; 2022 Aug; 8(8):e10274. PubMed ID: 36061036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Landfill site selection via integrating multi-criteria decision techniques with geographic information systems: a case study in Naqadeh, Iran.
Khorsandi H; Faramarzi A; Aghapour AA; Jafari SJ
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Nov; 191(12):730. PubMed ID: 31705330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying multi-criteria decision-making to improve the waste reduction policy in Taiwan.
Su JP; Hung ML; Chao CW; Ma HW
Waste Manag Res; 2010 Jan; 28(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19710114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Door-to-door recyclables collection programmes: Willingness to participate and influential factors with a case study in the city of Xanthi (Greece).
Tsalis T; Amarantidou S; Calabró P; Nikolaou I; Komilis D
Waste Manag Res; 2018 Sep; 36(9):760-766. PubMed ID: 29589517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Energy conservation and carbon reduction potential for solid waste in China.
Wang M; Li Z; Chen L; Liu P; Zhang R; Liu W; Ma Y; Wang Y; Li X
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Nov; 27(33):42158-42167. PubMed ID: 32860186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decision-theoretic rough set model and spatial analysis-based waste-to-energy incineration plant site selection: a case study in first-tier cities of China.
Zhang X; Kang J; Che Y; Cao X; Li P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Nov; 30(54):115699-115720. PubMed ID: 37889411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Municipal solid waste recycling and the significance of informal sector in urban China.
Linzner R; Salhofer S
Waste Manag Res; 2014 Sep; 32(9):896-907. PubMed ID: 25106535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. To dream or not to dream in Havana: multi-criteria decision-making for material and energy recovery from municipal solid wastes.
Alfonso-Cardero A; Pagés-Díaz J; Kalogirou E; Psomopoulos CS; Lorenzo-Llanes J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(4):8601-8616. PubMed ID: 34767162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of waste management and energy saving for sustainable green building through analytic hierarchy process and artificial neural network model.
Lu Y; Ge Y; Zhang G; Abdulwahab A; Salameh AA; Ali HE; Nguyen Le B
Chemosphere; 2023 Mar; 318():137708. PubMed ID: 36621688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
