These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33760413)
1. [INTRAPARTUM ULTRASOUND - THE FUTURE IS HERE]. Ron-Tal Fisher O; Vaisbuch E; Mizrahi O; Oberman M; Ben-Arie A; Levy R Harefuah; 2021 Feb; 160(2):110-116. PubMed ID: 33760413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrapartum ultrasound at the initiation of the active second stage of labor predicts spontaneous vaginal delivery. Hadad S; Oberman M; Ben-Arie A; Sacagiu M; Vaisbuch E; Levy R Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100249. PubMed ID: 33451615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound. Dall'Asta A; Angeli L; Masturzo B; Volpe N; Schera GBL; Di Pasquo E; Girlando F; Attini R; Menato G; Frusca T; Ghi T Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):642.e1-642.e13. PubMed ID: 31589867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor. Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advanced midwifery practice: intrapartum ultrasonography to assess fetal head station and comparison with vaginal digital examination. Messina MP; Piccioni MG; Petrella C; Vitali M; Greco A; Ralli M; Ceccanti M; Ferraguti G; Neri I; Ricchi A; Fiore M; D'Angelo A Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 73(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 33851805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intrapartum ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor. Kahrs BH; Eggebø TM Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Nov; 3(6S):100427. PubMed ID: 34273584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor. Chaemsaithong P; Kwan AHW; Tse WT; Lim WT; Chan WWY; Chong KC; Leung TY; Poon LC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):592.e1-592.e15. PubMed ID: 30735668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrapartum ultrasound use in clinical practice as a predictor of delivery mode during prolonged second stage of labor. Katzir T; Brezinov Y; Khairish E; Hadad S; Vaisbuch E; Levy R Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Mar; 307(3):763-770. PubMed ID: 35576076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Head progression distance in prolonged second stage of labor: relationship with mode of delivery and fetal head station. Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 23355510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrapartum ultrasound and the choice between assisted vaginal and cesarean delivery. Chan VYT; Lau WL Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Nov; 3(6S):100439. PubMed ID: 34216834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: a novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching. Hinkson L; Henrich W; Tutschek B Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 224(1):93.e1-93.e7. PubMed ID: 32693095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. Sherer DM; Miodovnik M; Bradley KS; Langer O Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):264-8. PubMed ID: 11896948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Sherer DM; Miodovnik M; Bradley KS; Langer O Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 11896947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression and head-perineum distance with correlation to conventional clinical parameters of labor progress and time to delivery. Chan YT; Ng VK; Yung WK; Lo TK; Leung WC; Lau WL J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Aug; 28(12):1476-81. PubMed ID: 25163523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Descent of the presenting part assessed with ultrasound. Eggebø TM; Hjartardottir H Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 230(3S):S901-S912. PubMed ID: 34461079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrapartum assessment of fetal head engagement: comparison between transvaginal digital and transabdominal ultrasound determinations. Sherer DM; Abulafia O Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 May; 21(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 12768551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The sonopartogram. Usman S; Hanidu A; Kovalenko M; Hassan WA; Lees C Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 May; 228(5S):S997-S1016. PubMed ID: 37164504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic accuracy of ultrasound measures of fetal head descent to predict outcome of operative vaginal birth: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Skinner SM; Giles-Clark HJ; Higgins C; Mol BW; Rolnik DL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jul; 229(1):10-22.e10. PubMed ID: 36427598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]