BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33760627)

  • 1. Comparison of Internal Patient Satisfaction Scores at a Cancer Center With Star Ratings on Online Physician-Rating Websites.
    Kim C; Chisholm G; Bevolo A; Shelton B; Kian L; Lewis CM; Garcia EA; Weber RS; Frumovitz M
    JCO Oncol Pract; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1181-e1188. PubMed ID: 33760627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Reimann S
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e299. PubMed ID: 28842391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physician Rating Websites: an Analysis of Physician Evaluation and Physician Perception.
    Syed UA; Acevedo D; Narzikul AC; Coomer W; Beredjiklian PK; Abboud JA
    Arch Bone Jt Surg; 2019 Mar; 7(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 31211191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data.
    Bidmon S; Elshiewy O; Terlutter R; Boztug Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e13830. PubMed ID: 32012063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Kahrass H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 18(1):670. PubMed ID: 30157842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
    Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Content and Nature of Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of 849 Comments.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Sep; 21(9):e14336. PubMed ID: 31573918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?
    Hageman MG; Ring DC; Gregory PJ; Rubash HE; Harmon L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 May; 473(5):1590-7. PubMed ID: 25287521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument.
    Emmert M; Meier F
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e157. PubMed ID: 23919987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association Between Social Media Activity and Ratings on Physician Review Websites Among Orthopaedic Surgeons With an Active Online Media Presence.
    Kerzner B; Dasari SP; Swindell HW; Obioha OA; Khan ZA; Rea PM; Fortier LM; Haynes MS; Chahla J
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2024 Feb; 12(2):23259671231209794. PubMed ID: 38332847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors Affecting Orthopedic Sports Medicine Surgeons' Online Reputation.
    Heimdal TR; Gardner SS; Dhanani UM; Harris JD; Liberman SR; McCulloch PC
    Orthopedics; 2021; 44(2):e281-e286. PubMed ID: 33316825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites.
    Terlutter R; Bidmon S; Röttl J
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Mar; 16(3):e97. PubMed ID: 24686918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rating Spine Surgeons: Physician Review Websites Versus a Patient-reported Outcomes-derived Ranking.
    Wanner JP; Pennings JS; Nian H; Sivaganesan A; Gupta R; Asher AL; Bydon M; Abtahi A; Zuckerman SL; Devin C; Archer KR; Stephens BF
    Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Oct; 35(8):E643-E648. PubMed ID: 35509107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System.
    Okike K; Uhr NR; Shin SYM; Xie KC; Kim CY; Funahashi TT; Kanter MH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 31531811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website.
    Emmert M; McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e24229. PubMed ID: 34309579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between social media utilization by academic neurosurgery departments and higher online patient ratings.
    Lamano JB; Riestenberg RA; Haskell-Mendoza AP; Lee D; Sharp MT; Bloch O
    J Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 136(6):1760-1772. PubMed ID: 34678765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An online review of plastic surgeons in southern California.
    Lewis P; Kobayashi E; Gupta S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 May; 74 Suppl 1():S66-70. PubMed ID: 25875912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rejected Online Feedback From a Swiss Physician Rating Website Between 2008 and 2017: Analysis of 2352 Ratings.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e18374. PubMed ID: 32687479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.