168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33761048)
1. History of safe exposure and bioinformatic assessment of phosphomannose-isomerase (PMI) for allergenic risk.
Herman RA; Hou Z; Mirsky H; Nelson ME; Mathesius CA; Roper JM
Transgenic Res; 2021 Apr; 30(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 33761048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phosphomannose isomerase, a novel plant selection system: potential allergenicity assessment.
Privalle LS
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2002 May; 964():129-38. PubMed ID: 12023200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of short amino acid sequence matches for prediction of protein allergenicity.
Silvanovich A; Nemeth MA; Song P; Herman R; Tagliani L; Bannon GA
Toxicol Sci; 2006 Mar; 90(1):252-8. PubMed ID: 16338955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioinformatic methods for allergenicity assessment using a comprehensive allergen database.
Hileman RE; Silvanovich A; Goodman RE; Rice EA; Holleschak G; Astwood JD; Hefle SL
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2002 Aug; 128(4):280-91. PubMed ID: 12218366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lack of cross-reactivity between the Bacillus thuringiensis derived protein Cry1F in maize grain and dust mite Der p7 protein with human sera positive for Der p7-IgE.
Ladics GS; Bardina L; Cressman RF; Mattsson JL; Sampson HA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 16406630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protein familiarity is a fundamental but rarely operationalized concept in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops: example of phosphomannose isomerase (PMI).
Carlson AB; Mathesius CA; Gunderson TA; Hession A; Bruyere R; Mirsky HP; Zhang J; Sandmann M; Fallers MN; Herman RA
Transgenic Res; 2023 Oct; 32(5):423-435. PubMed ID: 37415055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the potential allergenicity of genetically-engineered food crops.
Ladics GS
J Immunotoxicol; 2019 Dec; 16(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 30409058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of endogenous allergens for the safety evaluation of genetically engineered food crops: review of potential risks, test methods, examples and relevance.
Goodman RE; Panda R; Ariyarathna H
J Agric Food Chem; 2013 Sep; 61(35):8317-32. PubMed ID: 23848840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computational allergenicity prediction of transgenic proteins expressed in genetically modified crops.
Verma AK; Misra A; Subash S; Das M; Dwivedi PD
Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol; 2011 Sep; 33(3):410-22. PubMed ID: 20964517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence-based regulations for bioinformatic prediction of allergen cross-reactivity are needed.
Herman RA; Song P; Mirsky HP; Roper JM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Mar; 120():104841. PubMed ID: 33333099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Challenges in testing genetically modified crops for potential increases in endogenous allergen expression for safety.
Panda R; Ariyarathna H; Amnuaycheewa P; Tetteh A; Pramod SN; Taylor SL; Ballmer-Weber BK; Goodman RE
Allergy; 2013 Feb; 68(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 23205714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Approaches to assessment of the allergenic potential of novel proteins in food from genetically modified crops.
Kimber I; Dearman RJ
Toxicol Sci; 2002 Jul; 68(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 12075104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic?
Taylor SL; Hefle SL
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety assessment by in vitro digestibility and allergenicity of genetically modified maize with an amaranth 11S globulin.
Sinagawa-García SR; Rascón-Cruz Q; Valdez-Ortiz A; Medina-Godoy S; Escobar-Gutiérrez A; Paredes-López O
J Agric Food Chem; 2004 May; 52(9):2709-14. PubMed ID: 15113180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of E-scores to determine the quality of protein alignments.
Silvanovich A; Bannon G; McClain S
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S26-31. PubMed ID: 19245824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of bioinformatic approaches for predicting allergen cross reactivity.
Herman RA; Song P
Food Chem Toxicol; 2019 Oct; 132():110656. PubMed ID: 31279045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Allergenicity assessment of osmotin, a pathogenesis-related protein, used for transgenic crops.
Sharma P; Singh AK; Singh BP; Gaur SN; Arora N
J Agric Food Chem; 2011 Sep; 59(18):9990-5. PubMed ID: 21838306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative assessment of multiple criteria for the in silico prediction of cross-reactivity of proteins to known allergens.
Mirsky HP; Cressman RF; Ladics GS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 67(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23933007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performing IgE serum testing due to bioinformatics matches in the allergenicity assessment of GM crops.
Goodman RE
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S24-34. PubMed ID: 18715545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
