148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33762365)
1. NHS England-funded CT fractional flow reserve in the era of the ISCHEMIA trial.
Rasoul H; Fyyaz S; Noakes D; Shakespeare C; David S; Khawaja ZM; Papamichail N; Alfakih K
Clin Med (Lond); 2021 Mar; 21(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 33762365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs
Williams MC; Mirsadraee S; Dweck MR; Weir NW; Fletcher A; Lucatelli C; MacGillivray T; Golay SK; Cruden NL; Henriksen PA; Uren N; McKillop G; Lima JA; Reid JH; van Beek EJ; Patel D; Newby DE
Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 27334015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Onsite Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Suspected Stable Coronary Artery Disease Initial Experience.
Kapoor A; Mahajan G; Kapoor A
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2021 Apr; 31(2):291-296. PubMed ID: 34556910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed tomography coronary angiography: Diagnostic yield and downstream testing.
Fyyaz S; Hudson J; Olabintan O; Katsigris A; David S; Plein S; Alfakih K
Clin Med (Lond); 2020 Jan; 20(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 31941737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Downstream testing after CT coronary angiography: time for a rethink?
Morgan-Hughes G; Williams MC; Loudon M; Roobottom CA; Veitch A; Van Lingen R; Holloway B; Bellenger N; Schmitt M; Bull R
Open Heart; 2021 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 33622963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial.
Lu MT; Ferencik M; Roberts RS; Lee KL; Ivanov A; Adami E; Mark DB; Jaffer FA; Leipsic JA; Douglas PS; Hoffmann U
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1350-1358. PubMed ID: 28412436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study.
Douglas PS; Pontone G; Hlatky MA; Patel MR; Norgaard BL; Byrne RA; Curzen N; Purcell I; Gutberlet M; Rioufol G; Hink U; Schuchlenz HW; Feuchtner G; Gilard M; Andreini D; Jensen JM; Hadamitzky M; Chiswell K; Cyr D; Wilk A; Wang F; Rogers C; De Bruyne B;
Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(47):3359-67. PubMed ID: 26330417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of NICE and ESC proposed strategies on new onset chest pain and the contemporary clinical utility of pretest probability risk score.
Papachristidis A; Vaughan GF; Denny SJ; Akbari T; Avornyo E; Griffiths T; Saunders E; Byrne J; Monaghan MJ; Al Fakih K
Open Heart; 2020 May; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 32467136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of machine learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Qiao HY; Tang CX; Schoepf UJ; Tesche C; Bayer RR; Giovagnoli DA; Todd Hudson H; Zhou CS; Yan J; Lu MJ; Zhou F; Lu GM; Jiang JW; Zhang LJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5841-5851. PubMed ID: 32462444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hemodynamic impact of coronary stenosis using computed tomography: comparison between noninvasive fractional flow reserve and 3D fusion of coronary angiography with stress myocardial perfusion.
Patel AR; Maffessanti F; Patel MB; Kebed K; Narang A; Singh A; Medvedofsky D; Zaidi SJ; Mediratta A; Goyal N; Kachenoura N; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1733-1743. PubMed ID: 31073698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic role of coronary calcium scoring in the rapid access chest pain clinic: prospective evaluation of NICE guidance.
Yerramasu A; Lahiri A; Venuraju S; Dumo A; Lipkin D; Underwood SR; Rakhit RD; Patel DJ
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Aug; 15(8):886-92. PubMed ID: 24513880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex-based inequalities in contemporary UK hospital management of stable chest pain.
Morgan-Hughes G; Williams MC; Loudon M; Roobottom CA; Iacovides S; Wotton F; Veitch A; Bull R
Open Heart; 2021 Jun; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 34083391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Harmonizing multimodality imaging results using Bayesian analysis: the case of CT coronary angiography and CT-derived fractional flow reserve.
Christian TF; Marfatia R; Chen LQ; Onuegbu AG; Pollack S; Cao J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jun; 38(6):1409-1419. PubMed ID: 35092523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in the Assessment and Management of Stable Chest Pain: Rationale and Design of the FORECAST Trial.
Mahmoudi M; Nicholas Z; Nuttall J; Bresser M; Maishman T; Berry C; Hlatky MA; Douglas P; Rajani R; Fox K; Curzen N
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Jul; 21(7):890-896. PubMed ID: 31932171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Fractional Flow Reserve.
Hulten E; Ahmadi A; Blankstein R
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):623-31. PubMed ID: 25770850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate-Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings.
Nørgaard BL; Gormsen LC; Bøtker HE; Parner E; Nielsen LH; Mathiassen ON; Grove EL; Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Pedersen K; Terkelsen CJ; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Mæng M; Kristensen SD; Krusell LR; Lassen JF; Jensen JM
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 28862968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT-based total vessel plaque analyses improves prediction of hemodynamic significance lesions as assessed by fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina pectoris.
Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Jensen JM; Dey D; Bøtker HE; Ahmadi A; Achenbach S; Ko B; Nørgaard BL
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 29866619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of image resolution on computation of fractional flow reserve: coronary computed tomography angiography versus 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
Liu L; Yang W; Nagahara Y; Li Y; Lamooki SR; Muramatsu T; Kitslaar P; Sarai M; Ozaki Y; Barlis P; Yan F; Reiber JH; Tu S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 26507326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Cami E; Tagami T; Raff G; Fonte TA; Renard B; Gallagher MJ; Chinnaiyan K; Bilolikar A; Fan A; Hafeez A; Safian RD
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(6):480-492. PubMed ID: 30274795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion With a Whole-Heart Coverage Scanner in Addition to Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve Computed Tomography Derived.
Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Soldi M; Del Torto A; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Olivares P; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Dec; 12(12):2460-2471. PubMed ID: 31005531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
