These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33764042)

  • 1. Energy and CO
    Bartholomew TV; Mauter MS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Apr; 55(8):4305-4313. PubMed ID: 33764042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiwell CO2 injectivity: impact of boundary conditions and brine extraction on geologic CO2 storage efficiency and pressure buildup.
    Heath JE; McKenna SA; Dewers TA; Roach JD; Kobos PH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jan; 48(2):1067-74. PubMed ID: 23971876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative permeability experiments of carbon dioxide displacing brine and their implications for carbon sequestration.
    Levine JS; Goldberg DS; Lackner KS; Matter JM; Supp MG; Ramakrishnan TS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(1):811-8. PubMed ID: 24274391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved Vinegar & Wellington calibration for estimation of fluid saturation and porosity from CT images for a core flooding test under geologic carbon storage conditions.
    Miao X; Wang Y; Zhang L; Wei N; Li X
    Micron; 2019 Sep; 124():102703. PubMed ID: 31284162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Capillary pressure-saturation relations for supercritical CO2 and brine in limestone/dolomite sands: implications for geologic carbon sequestration in carbonate reservoirs.
    Wang S; Tokunaga TK
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(12):7208-17. PubMed ID: 25945400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
    White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Life cycle assessment of treatment and handling options for a highly saline brine extracted from a potential CO
    Salih HH; Li J; Kaplan R; Dastgheib SA
    Water Res; 2017 Oct; 122():419-430. PubMed ID: 28623835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of pressure and temperature on CO2-brine-mica contact angles and CO2-brine interfacial tension: Implications for carbon geo-sequestration.
    Arif M; Al-Yaseri AZ; Barifcani A; Lebedev M; Iglauer S
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2016 Jan; 462():208-15. PubMed ID: 26454380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity thresholds of groundwater parameters for detecting CO
    Berger PM; Wimmer B; Iranmanesh A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Oct; 191(11):685. PubMed ID: 31659477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reservoir engineering to accelerate the dissolution of CO2 stored in aquifers.
    Leonenko Y; Keith DW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Apr; 42(8):2742-7. PubMed ID: 18497117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Volumetrics of CO2 storage in deep saline formations.
    Steele-MacInnis M; Capobianco RM; Dilmore R; Goodman A; Guthrie G; Rimstidt JD; Bodnar RJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 22916959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiphase modeling of geologic carbon sequestration in saline aquifers.
    Bandilla KW; Celia MA; Birkholzer JT; Cihan A; Leister EC
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(3):362-77. PubMed ID: 25662534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geochemical controls on CO
    Sharma S; Agrawal V; McGrath S; Hakala JA; Lopano C; Goodman A
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2021 Sep; 23(9):1278-1300. PubMed ID: 34553724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from U.S. Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants.
    Psarras P; He J; Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Jensen-Fellows A; Kian K; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(10):6272-6280. PubMed ID: 32329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting supercritical CO2 in brine at sequestration pressure with an optical fiber sensor.
    Bao B; Melo L; Davies B; Fadaei H; Sinton D; Wild P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):306-13. PubMed ID: 23153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nanoscale Chemical Processes Affecting Storage Capacities and Seals during Geologic CO
    Jun YS; Zhang L; Min Y; Li Q
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Jul; 50(7):1521-1529. PubMed ID: 28686035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Fluid-Rock Interactions on In Situ Bacterial Alteration of Interfacial Properties and Wettability of CO
    Park T; Yoon S; Jung J; Kwon TH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 54(23):15355-15365. PubMed ID: 33186009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility study of using brine for carbon dioxide capture and storage from fixed sources.
    Dziedzic D; Gross KB; Gorski RA; Johnson JT
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Dec; 56(12):1631-41. PubMed ID: 17195482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.