185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33764042)
1. Energy and CO
Bartholomew TV; Mauter MS
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Apr; 55(8):4305-4313. PubMed ID: 33764042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiwell CO2 injectivity: impact of boundary conditions and brine extraction on geologic CO2 storage efficiency and pressure buildup.
Heath JE; McKenna SA; Dewers TA; Roach JD; Kobos PH
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jan; 48(2):1067-74. PubMed ID: 23971876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relative permeability experiments of carbon dioxide displacing brine and their implications for carbon sequestration.
Levine JS; Goldberg DS; Lackner KS; Matter JM; Supp MG; Ramakrishnan TS
Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(1):811-8. PubMed ID: 24274391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved Vinegar & Wellington calibration for estimation of fluid saturation and porosity from CT images for a core flooding test under geologic carbon storage conditions.
Miao X; Wang Y; Zhang L; Wei N; Li X
Micron; 2019 Sep; 124():102703. PubMed ID: 31284162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Capillary pressure-saturation relations for supercritical CO2 and brine in limestone/dolomite sands: implications for geologic carbon sequestration in carbonate reservoirs.
Wang S; Tokunaga TK
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(12):7208-17. PubMed ID: 25945400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Life cycle assessment of treatment and handling options for a highly saline brine extracted from a potential CO
Salih HH; Li J; Kaplan R; Dastgheib SA
Water Res; 2017 Oct; 122():419-430. PubMed ID: 28623835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of pressure and temperature on CO2-brine-mica contact angles and CO2-brine interfacial tension: Implications for carbon geo-sequestration.
Arif M; Al-Yaseri AZ; Barifcani A; Lebedev M; Iglauer S
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2016 Jan; 462():208-15. PubMed ID: 26454380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity thresholds of groundwater parameters for detecting CO
Berger PM; Wimmer B; Iranmanesh A
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Oct; 191(11):685. PubMed ID: 31659477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reservoir engineering to accelerate the dissolution of CO2 stored in aquifers.
Leonenko Y; Keith DW
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Apr; 42(8):2742-7. PubMed ID: 18497117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Volumetrics of CO2 storage in deep saline formations.
Steele-MacInnis M; Capobianco RM; Dilmore R; Goodman A; Guthrie G; Rimstidt JD; Bodnar RJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 22916959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiphase modeling of geologic carbon sequestration in saline aquifers.
Bandilla KW; Celia MA; Birkholzer JT; Cihan A; Leister EC
Ground Water; 2015; 53(3):362-77. PubMed ID: 25662534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Geochemical controls on CO
Sharma S; Agrawal V; McGrath S; Hakala JA; Lopano C; Goodman A
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2021 Sep; 23(9):1278-1300. PubMed ID: 34553724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from U.S. Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants.
Psarras P; He J; Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Jensen-Fellows A; Kian K; Wilcox J
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(10):6272-6280. PubMed ID: 32329614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detecting supercritical CO2 in brine at sequestration pressure with an optical fiber sensor.
Bao B; Melo L; Davies B; Fadaei H; Sinton D; Wild P
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):306-13. PubMed ID: 23153197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nanoscale Chemical Processes Affecting Storage Capacities and Seals during Geologic CO
Jun YS; Zhang L; Min Y; Li Q
Acc Chem Res; 2017 Jul; 50(7):1521-1529. PubMed ID: 28686035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Fluid-Rock Interactions on In Situ Bacterial Alteration of Interfacial Properties and Wettability of CO
Park T; Yoon S; Jung J; Kwon TH
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 54(23):15355-15365. PubMed ID: 33186009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility study of using brine for carbon dioxide capture and storage from fixed sources.
Dziedzic D; Gross KB; Gorski RA; Johnson JT
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Dec; 56(12):1631-41. PubMed ID: 17195482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
