These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33764042)

  • 21. Molecular dynamics computations of brine-CO2 interfacial tensions and brine-CO2-quartz contact angles and their effects on structural and residual trapping mechanisms in carbon geo-sequestration.
    Iglauer S; Mathew MS; Bresme F
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2012 Nov; 386(1):405-14. PubMed ID: 22921540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Regional assessment of CO2-solubility trapping potential: a case study of the coastal and offshore Texas Miocene interval.
    Yang C; Treviño RH; Zhang T; Romanak KD; Wallace K; Lu J; Mickler PJ; Hovorka SD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):8275-82. PubMed ID: 24956931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Framework for the assessment of interaction between CO2 geological storage and other sedimentary basin resources.
    Michael K; Whittaker S; Varma S; Bekele E; Langhi L; Hodgkinson J; Harris B
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Feb; 18(2):164-75. PubMed ID: 26767550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rate of CO2 attack on hydrated Class H well cement under geologic sequestration conditions.
    Kutchko BG; Strazisar BR; Lowry GV; Dzombak DA; Thaulow N
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Aug; 42(16):6237-42. PubMed ID: 18767693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Achieving Zero/Negative-Emissions Coal-Fired Power Plants Using Amine-Based Postcombustion CO
    Jiang K; Feron P; Cousins A; Zhai R; Li K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Feb; 54(4):2429-2438. PubMed ID: 31990528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biosurfactant as an Enhancer of Geologic Carbon Storage: Microbial Modification of Interfacial Tension and Contact Angle in Carbon dioxide/Water/Quartz Systems.
    Park T; Joo HW; Kim GY; Kim S; Yoon S; Kwon TH
    Front Microbiol; 2017; 8():1285. PubMed ID: 28744272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Water challenges for geologic carbon capture and sequestration.
    Newmark RL; Friedmann SJ; Carroll SA
    Environ Manage; 2010 Apr; 45(4):651-61. PubMed ID: 20127328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial stochastic modeling of sedimentary formations to assess CO2 storage potential.
    Popova OH; Small MJ; McCoy ST; Thomas AC; Rose S; Karimi B; Carter K; Goodman A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jun; 48(11):6247-55. PubMed ID: 24824160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Barriers and Prospects of Carbon Sequestration in India.
    Gupta A; Nema AK
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2014 Apr; 56(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 26563072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Coupled Geochemical Impacts of Leaking CO2 and Contaminants from Subsurface Storage Reservoirs on Groundwater Quality.
    Shao H; Qafoku NP; Lawter AR; Bowden ME; Brown CF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):8202-9. PubMed ID: 26039150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CO2 reaction with hydrated class H well cement under geologic sequestration conditions: effects of flyash admixtures.
    Kutchko BG; Strazisar BR; Huerta N; Lowry GV; Dzombak DA; Thaulow N
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 May; 43(10):3947-52. PubMed ID: 19544912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. CO2 Accounting and Risk Analysis for CO2 Sequestration at Enhanced Oil Recovery Sites.
    Dai Z; Viswanathan H; Middleton R; Pan F; Ampomah W; Yang C; Jia W; Xiao T; Lee SY; McPherson B; Balch R; Grigg R; White M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(14):7546-54. PubMed ID: 27362472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of Maximum Allowable Cost on CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Formations.
    Mathias SA; Gluyas JG; Goldthorpe WH; Mackay EJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(22):13510-8. PubMed ID: 26480926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Systems Analysis of Physical Absorption of CO
    Zhai H; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Apr; 52(8):4996-5004. PubMed ID: 29589925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Total cost of carbon capture and storage implemented at a regional scale: northeastern and midwestern United States.
    Schmelz WJ; Hochman G; Miller KG
    Interface Focus; 2020 Oct; 10(5):20190065. PubMed ID: 32832064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of Chemical, Mechanical, and Transport Processes on Wellbore Leakage from Geologic CO
    Carroll SA; Iyer J; Walsh SDC
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Aug; 50(8):1829-1837. PubMed ID: 28741360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration of Process Emissions from the U.S. Industrial Sector.
    Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Maynard D; Psarras P; He J; Rufael T; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 54(12):7524-7532. PubMed ID: 32432460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Molecular simulation of carbon dioxide, brine, and clay mineral interactions and determination of contact angles.
    Tenney CM; Cygan RT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(3):2035-42. PubMed ID: 24410258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A review of CO2 sequestration projects and application in China.
    Tang Y; Yang R; Bian X
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():381854. PubMed ID: 25302323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. CO2 Exsolution from CO2 Saturated Water: Core-Scale Experiments and Focus on Impacts of Pressure Variations.
    Xu R; Li R; Ma J; Jiang P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14696-703. PubMed ID: 26509211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.