250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33764050)
1. Estimating the Roles of Protonation and Electronic Polarization in Absolute Binding Affinity Simulations.
King E; Qi R; Li H; Luo R; Aitchison E
J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Apr; 17(4):2541-2555. PubMed ID: 33764050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding affinities from extensive alchemical and end-point free energy calculations.
Huai Z; Yang H; Li X; Sun Z
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 33037549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.
Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Blind prediction of charged ligand binding affinities in a model binding site.
Rocklin GJ; Boyce SE; Fischer M; Fish I; Mobley DL; Shoichet BK; Dill KA
J Mol Biol; 2013 Nov; 425(22):4569-83. PubMed ID: 23896298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.
He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tinker-OpenMM: Absolute and relative alchemical free energies using AMOEBA on GPUs.
Harger M; Li D; Wang Z; Dalby K; Lagardère L; Piquemal JP; Ponder J; Ren P
J Comput Chem; 2017 Sep; 38(23):2047-2055. PubMed ID: 28600826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Elimination of Finite-Size Effects on Binding Free Energies via the Warp-Drive Method.
Ekimoto T; Yamane T; Ikeguchi M
J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Dec; 14(12):6544-6559. PubMed ID: 30404450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absolute Alchemical Free Energy Calculations for Ligand Binding: A Beginner's Guide.
Aldeghi M; Bluck JP; Biggin PC
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():199-232. PubMed ID: 29594774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accurate prediction of protonation state as a prerequisite for reliable MM-PB(GB)SA binding free energy calculations of HIV-1 protease inhibitors.
Wittayanarakul K; Hannongbua S; Feig M
J Comput Chem; 2008 Apr; 29(5):673-85. PubMed ID: 17849388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods.
Hansson T; Marelius J; Aqvist J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1998 Jan; 12(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 9570087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absolute Protein Binding Free Energy Simulations for Ligands with Multiple Poses, a Thermodynamic Path That Avoids Exhaustive Enumeration of the Poses.
Sakae Y; Zhang BW; Levy RM; Deng N
J Comput Chem; 2020 Jan; 41(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 31621932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies.
Genheden S; Ryde U
Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rigorous Free Energy Perturbation Approach to Estimating Relative Binding Affinities between Ligands with Multiple Protonation and Tautomeric States.
de Oliveira C; Yu HS; Chen W; Abel R; Wang L
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Jan; 15(1):424-435. PubMed ID: 30537823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calculation of protein-ligand binding free energy by using a polarizable potential.
Jiao D; Golubkov PA; Darden TA; Ren P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Apr; 105(17):6290-5. PubMed ID: 18427113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of ligand binding affinity and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dynamics simulations and the linear interaction energy method.
van Lipzig MM; ter Laak AM; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP; Wamelink M; Geerke D; Meerman JH
J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 14761204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.
Lee TS; Allen BK; Giese TJ; Guo Z; Li P; Lin C; McGee TD; Pearlman DA; Radak BK; Tao Y; Tsai HC; Xu H; Sherman W; York DM
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5595-5623. PubMed ID: 32936637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple protonation equilibria in electrostatics of protein-protein binding.
Piłat Z; Antosiewicz JM
J Phys Chem B; 2008 Nov; 112(47):15074-85. PubMed ID: 18950218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thermodynamic integration to predict host-guest binding affinities.
Lawrenz M; Wereszczynski J; Ortiz-Sánchez JM; Nichols SE; McCammon JA
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 22350568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accurate predictions of nonpolar solvation free energies require explicit consideration of binding-site hydration.
Genheden S; Mikulskis P; Hu L; Kongsted J; Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
J Am Chem Soc; 2011 Aug; 133(33):13081-92. PubMed ID: 21728337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Linear interaction energy models for beta-secretase (BACE) inhibitors: Role of van der Waals, electrostatic, and continuum-solvation terms.
Tounge BA; Rajamani R; Baxter EW; Reitz AB; Reynolds CH
J Mol Graph Model; 2006 May; 24(6):475-84. PubMed ID: 16293430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
