These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33764100)

  • 1. Individual differences in the allocation of visual attention during navigation.
    Keller M; Sutton JE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Mar; 76(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 33764100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in cognitive map accuracy: Investigating the role of landmark familiarity.
    Youngson NL; Vollebregt M; Sutton JE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Mar; 73(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 30883177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory.
    Weisberg SM; Newcombe NS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 May; 42(5):768-785. PubMed ID: 26595065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.
    Kraemer DJ; Schinazi VR; Cawkwell PB; Tekriwal A; Epstein RA; Thompson-Schill SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 27668486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.
    Keil J; Edler D; Kuchinke L; Dickmann F
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229575. PubMed ID: 32119712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related similarities and differences in monitoring spatial cognition.
    Ariel R; Moffat SD
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2018 May; 25(3):351-377. PubMed ID: 28361562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.
    Weisberg SM; Schinazi VR; Newcombe NS; Shipley TF; Epstein RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):669-682. PubMed ID: 24364725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the effects of a programming error on a virtual environment measure of spatial navigation behavior.
    Weisberg SM; Schinazi VR; Ferrario A; Newcombe NS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):575-589. PubMed ID: 36074604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal development of cognitive mapping from childhood to adolescence.
    Brucato M; Nazareth A; Newcombe NS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Jul; 219():105412. PubMed ID: 35272067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial navigation from same and different directions: The role of executive functions, memory and attention in adults with autism spectrum disorder.
    Ring M; Gaigg SB; de Condappa O; Wiener JM; Bowler DM
    Autism Res; 2018 May; 11(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 29405653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Charting the development of cognitive mapping.
    Nazareth A; Weisberg SM; Margulis K; Newcombe NS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Jun; 170():86-106. PubMed ID: 29453130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in teleporting through virtual environments.
    Cherep LA; Kelly JW; Miller A; Lim AF; Gilbert SB
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Mar; 29(1):111-123. PubMed ID: 34990154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct current brain stimulation enhances navigation efficiency in individuals with low spatial sense of direction.
    Brunyé TT; Holmes A; Cantelon J; Eddy MD; Gardony AL; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA
    Neuroreport; 2014 Oct; 25(15):1175-9. PubMed ID: 25144391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Navigation experience and mental representations of the environment: do pilots build better cognitive maps?
    Sutton JE; Buset M; Keller M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90058. PubMed ID: 24603608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are you sure the library is that way? Metacognitive monitoring of spatial judgments.
    Stevens CA; Carlson RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1034-49. PubMed ID: 26866660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining egoformative and alloformative cues in a novel tabletop navigation task.
    Starrett MJ; Huffman DJ; Ekstrom AD
    Psychol Res; 2023 Jul; 87(5):1644-1664. PubMed ID: 36181560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different "routes" to a cognitive map: dissociable forms of spatial knowledge derived from route and cartographic map learning.
    Zhang H; Zherdeva K; Ekstrom AD
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1106-17. PubMed ID: 24845757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Cognitive Style on Learning and Retrieval of Navigational Environments.
    Boccia M; Vecchione F; Piccardi L; Guariglia C
    Front Pharmacol; 2017; 8():496. PubMed ID: 28790920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Where did it come from, where do you go? Direction sources influence navigation decisions during spatial uncertainty.
    Brunyé TT; Gagnon SA; Gardony AL; Gopal N; Holmes A; Taylor HA; Tenbrink T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(3):585-607. PubMed ID: 25285995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Where are we going and where have we been? Examining the effects of maps on spatial learning in an indoor guided navigation task.
    Stites MC; Matzen LE; Gastelum ZN
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Mar; 5(1):13. PubMed ID: 32198712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.