These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33764100)

  • 21. The dynamics of memory consolidation of landmarks.
    van Ekert J; Wegman J; Jansen C; Takashima A; Janzen G
    Hippocampus; 2017 Apr; 27(4):393-404. PubMed ID: 28032685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interindividual differences influence multisensory processing during spatial navigation.
    Zanchi S; Cuturi LF; Sandini G; Gori M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Feb; 48(2):174-189. PubMed ID: 35225632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Individual Differences and Skill Training in Cognitive Mapping: How and Why People Differ.
    Ishikawa T
    Top Cogn Sci; 2023 Jan; 15(1):163-186. PubMed ID: 35226795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Age-Related Differences in Associative Learning of Landmarks and Heading Directions in a Virtual Navigation Task.
    Zhong JY; Moffat SD
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2016; 8():122. PubMed ID: 27303290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Are visual cues helpful for virtual spatial navigation and spatial memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease?
    Cogné M; Auriacombe S; Vasa L; Tison F; Klinger E; Sauzéon H; Joseph PA; N Kaoua B
    Neuropsychology; 2018 May; 32(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 29809030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of age in women in visuo-spatial memory in reaching and navigation tasks with and without landmarks.
    Perrochon A; Mandigout S; Petruzzellis S; Soria Garcia N; Zaoui M; Berthoz A; Daviet JC
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Sep; 684():13-17. PubMed ID: 29966753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The role of working memory capacity in spatial learning depends on spatial information integration difficulty in the environment.
    He Q; Han AT; Churaman TA; Brown TI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Apr; 150(4):666-685. PubMed ID: 32924520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Map in Our Head Is Not Oriented North: Evidence from a Real-World Environment.
    Brunyé TT; Burte H; Houck LA; Taylor HA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0135803. PubMed ID: 26353119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selecting landmarks in novel environments.
    Miller J; Carlson L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 21327344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retrieval practice enhances near but not far transfer of spatial memory.
    Brunyé TT; Smith AM; Hendel D; Gardony AL; Martis SB; Taylor HA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):24-45. PubMed ID: 30998073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acquisition and transfer of spatial knowledge during wayfinding.
    He Q; McNamara TP; Bodenheimer B; Klippel A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1364-1386. PubMed ID: 30124310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Developing global spatial memories by one-shot across-boundary navigation.
    Lei X; Mou W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jun; 48(6):798-812. PubMed ID: 34726438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does field independence predict visuo-spatial abilities underpinning human navigation? Behavioural evidence.
    Boccia M; Piccardi L; Di Marco M; Pizzamiglio L; Guariglia C
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2799-807. PubMed ID: 27225254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial thinking, cognitive mapping, and spatial awareness.
    Ishikawa T
    Cogn Process; 2021 Sep; 22(Suppl 1):89-96. PubMed ID: 34313882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Wayfinding and acquisition of spatial knowledge with navigation assistance.
    Münzer S; Lörch L; Frankenstein J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 31246054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Representation of human spatial navigation responding to input spatial information and output navigational strategies: An ALE meta-analysis.
    Qiu Y; Wu Y; Liu R; Wang J; Huang H; Huang R
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2019 Aug; 103():60-72. PubMed ID: 31201830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Meaningfulness of landmark pictograms reduces visual salience and recognition performance.
    Keil J; Edler D; Dickmann F; Kuchinke L
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Feb; 75():214-220. PubMed ID: 30509529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Restructuring the navigational field: individual predisposition towards field independence predicts preferred navigational strategy.
    Boccia M; Piccardi L; D'Alessandro A; Nori R; Guariglia C
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1741-1748. PubMed ID: 28283695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond.
    Epstein RA; Patai EZ; Julian JB; Spiers HJ
    Nat Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 20(11):1504-1513. PubMed ID: 29073650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How do we get there? Effects of cognitive aging on route memory.
    O'Malley M; Innes A; Wiener JM
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Feb; 46(2):274-284. PubMed ID: 29119542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.