These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33764125)

  • 1. Exemplar-model account of categorization and recognition when training instances never repeat.
    Hu M; Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1947-1969. PubMed ID: 33764125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning concepts when instances never repeat.
    Homa D; Blair M; McClure SM; Medema J; Stone G
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Apr; 47(3):395-411. PubMed ID: 30421314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A high-distortion enhancement effect in the prototype-learning paradigm: dramatic effects of category learning during test.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2088-96. PubMed ID: 18265623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Training set coherence and set size effects on concept generalization and recognition.
    Bowman CR; Zeithamova D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1442-1464. PubMed ID: 32105147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrasting exemplar and prototype models in a natural-science category domain.
    Nosofsky RM; Meagher BJ; Kumar P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1970-1994. PubMed ID: 35617221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.
    Smith JD; Minda JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.
    Nosofsky RM; Kruschke JK; McKinley SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):211-33. PubMed ID: 1532819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information.
    Busemeyer JR; Dewey GI; Medin DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Oct; 10(4):638-48. PubMed ID: 6239005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Smith JD; Redford JS; Haas SM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):390-401. PubMed ID: 18473665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tests of an exemplar-memory model of classification learning in a high-dimensional natural-science category domain.
    Nosofsky RM; Sanders CA; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Mar; 147(3):328-353. PubMed ID: 29058939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of age on category learning and prototype- and exemplar-based generalization.
    Bowman CR; Iwashita T; Zeithamova D
    Psychol Aging; 2022 Nov; 37(7):800-815. PubMed ID: 36222646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition.
    Shin HJ; Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Sep; 121(3):278-304. PubMed ID: 1402702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in learning and transfer: stable tendencies for learning exemplars versus abstracting rules.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill MJ; Robbins M; Wiener C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):668-93. PubMed ID: 23750912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is there an exemplar theory of concepts?
    Murphy GL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Aug; 23(4):1035-42. PubMed ID: 27294422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. False prototype enhancement effects in dot pattern categorization.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Apr; 32(3):390-8. PubMed ID: 15285123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison-based learning of relational categories (you'll never guess).
    Patterson JD; Kurtz KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):851-871. PubMed ID: 31535890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transfer between local and global processing levels by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens) in exemplar- and rule-based categorization tasks.
    Aust U; Braunöder E
    J Comp Psychol; 2015 Feb; 129(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 25150965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Given versus induced category representations: use of prototype and exemplar information in classification.
    Medin DL; Altom MW; Murphy TD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jul; 10(3):333-52. PubMed ID: 6235306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization.
    Palmeri TJ; Nosofsky RM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):197-235. PubMed ID: 11216316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.