1087 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33764423)
21. Prioritizing breast imaging services during the COVID pandemic: A survey of breast imaging facilities within the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
Sprague BL; O'Meara ES; Lee CI; Lee JM; Henderson LM; Buist DSM; Alsheik N; Macarol T; Perry H; Tosteson ANA; Onega T; Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL
Prev Med; 2021 Oct; 151():106540. PubMed ID: 34217424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of Mortality Among Participants of Women's Health Initiative Trials With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers vs Interval Breast Cancers.
Irvin VL; Zhang Z; Simon MS; Chlebowski RT; Luoh SW; Shadyab AH; Krok-Schoen JL; Tabung FK; Qi L; Stefanick ML; Schedin P; Jindal S
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jun; 3(6):e207227. PubMed ID: 32602908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Racial and Ethnic Variation in Diagnostic Mammography Performance among Women Reporting a Breast Lump.
Nyante SJ; Abraham L; Aiello Bowles EJ; Lee CI; Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL; Sprague BL; Henderson LM;
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2023 Nov; 32(11):1542-1551. PubMed ID: 37440458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cumulative 6-Year Risk of Screen-Detected Ductal Carcinoma In Situ by Screening Frequency.
Sprague BL; Chen S; Miglioretti DL; Gard CC; Tice JA; Hubbard RA; Aiello Bowles EJ; Kaufman PA; Kerlikowske K
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Feb; 6(2):e230166. PubMed ID: 36808238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography in Older Women.
Upneja A; Long JB; Aminawung JA; Kyanko KA; Kunst N; Xu X; Busch SH; Gross CP; Richman IB
J Gen Intern Med; 2022 Jun; 37(8):1870-1876. PubMed ID: 34595682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Are there racial/ethnic disparities among women younger than 40 undergoing mammography?
Kapp JM; Walker R; Haneuse S; Buist DS; Yankaskas BC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 20204501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Facility Mammography Volume in Relation to Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes.
Onega T; Goldman LE; Walker RL; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Taplin S; Geller BM; Hill DA; Smith-Bindman R
J Med Screen; 2016 Mar; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 26265482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors Impacting False Positive Recall in Screening Mammography.
Honig EL; Mullen LA; Amir T; Alvin MD; Jones MK; Ambinder EB; Falomo ET; Harvey SC
Acad Radiol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):1505-1512. PubMed ID: 30772138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Variation in Mammographic Breast Density Assessments Among Radiologists in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Observational Study.
Sprague BL; Conant EF; Onega T; Garcia MP; Beaber EF; Herschorn SD; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN; Lacson R; Schnall MD; Kontos D; Haas JS; Weaver DL; Barlow WE;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Oct; 165(7):457-464. PubMed ID: 27428568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of Using the Same vs Different Order for Second Readings of Screening Mammograms on Rates of Breast Cancer Detection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Taylor-Phillips S; Wallis MG; Jenkinson D; Adekanmbi V; Parsons H; Dunn J; Stallard N; Szczepura A; Gates S; Kearins O; Duncan A; Hudson S; Clarke A
JAMA; 2016 May; 315(18):1956-65. PubMed ID: 27163985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mammography use among women aged 18-39 years in the United States.
Qin J; White MC; Sabatino SA; Febo-Vázquez I
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Apr; 168(3):687-693. PubMed ID: 29264752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Change in Breast Cancer Screening Intervals Since the 2009 USPSTF Guideline.
Wernli KJ; Arao RF; Hubbard RA; Sprague BL; Alford-Teaster J; Haas JS; Henderson L; Hill D; Lee CI; Tosteson ANA; Onega T
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Aug; 26(8):820-827. PubMed ID: 28177856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient, primary care provider, and stakeholder perspectives on mammography screening frequency: lessons learned from a qualitative study.
Ro V; Jones T; Silverman T; McGuinness JE; Guzman A; Amenta J; Kukafka R; Crew KD
BMC Cancer; 2022 Jul; 22(1):819. PubMed ID: 35897000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of intermediate mammography assessment on the likelihood of false-positive results in breast cancer screening programmes.
Ascunce N; Ederra M; Delfrade J; Baroja A; Erdozain N; Zubizarreta R; Salas D; Castells X;
Eur Radiol; 2012 Feb; 22(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 21901564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study.
Lång K; Josefsson V; Larsson AM; Larsson S; Högberg C; Sartor H; Hofvind S; Andersson I; Rosso A
Lancet Oncol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):936-944. PubMed ID: 37541274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Population-level impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on breast cancer screening and diagnostic procedures.
Nyante SJ; Benefield TS; Kuzmiak CM; Earnhardt K; Pritchard M; Henderson LM
Cancer; 2021 Jun; 127(12):2111-2121. PubMed ID: 33635541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
