These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33765529)

  • 1. Speaker separation in realistic noise environments with applications to a cognitively-controlled hearing aid.
    Borgström BJ; Brandstein MS; Ciccarelli GA; Quatieri TF; Smalt CJ
    Neural Netw; 2021 Aug; 140():136-147. PubMed ID: 33765529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EEG-based auditory attention detection: boundary conditions for background noise and speaker positions.
    Das N; Bertrand A; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Dec; 15(6):066017. PubMed ID: 30207293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural decoding of attentional selection in multi-speaker environments without access to separated sources.
    O'Sullivan J; Zhuo Chen ; Sheth SA; McKhann G; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():1644-1647. PubMed ID: 29060199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Different Acoustic Components on EEG-Based Auditory Attention Decoding in Noisy and Reverberant Conditions.
    Aroudi A; Mirkovic B; De Vos M; Doclo S
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Apr; 27(4):652-663. PubMed ID: 30843845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural decoding of attentional selection in multi-speaker environments without access to clean sources.
    O'Sullivan J; Chen Z; Herrero J; McKhann GM; Sheth SA; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Oct; 14(5):056001. PubMed ID: 28776506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EEG-Informed Attended Speaker Extraction From Recorded Speech Mixtures With Application in Neuro-Steered Hearing Prostheses.
    Van Eyndhoven S; Francart T; Bertrand A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 May; 64(5):1045-1056. PubMed ID: 27392339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Congruent audiovisual speech enhances auditory attention decoding with EEG.
    Fu Z; Wu X; Chen J
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Nov; 16(6):066033. PubMed ID: 31505476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linear versus deep learning methods for noisy speech separation for EEG-informed attention decoding.
    Das N; Zegers J; Van Hamme H; Francart T; Bertrand A
    J Neural Eng; 2020 Aug; 17(4):046039. PubMed ID: 32679578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of head-related filtering and ear-specific decoding bias on auditory attention detection.
    Das N; Biesmans W; Bertrand A; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Oct; 13(5):056014. PubMed ID: 27618842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes.
    Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EEG decoding of the target speaker in a cocktail party scenario: considerations regarding dynamic switching of talker location.
    Teoh ES; Lalor EC
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Jun; 16(3):036017. PubMed ID: 30836345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contribution of binaural masking release to improved speech intelligibility for different masker types.
    Sutojo S; van de Par S; Schoenmaker E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1339-1352. PubMed ID: 29855098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Speech-Level-Based Segmented Model to Decode the Dynamic Auditory Attention States in the Competing Speaker Scenes.
    Wang L; Wang Y; Liu Z; Wu EX; Chen F
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():760611. PubMed ID: 35221885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EEG-based auditory attention decoding using speech-level-based segmented computational models.
    Wang L; Wu EX; Chen F
    J Neural Eng; 2021 May; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33957606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved Decoding of Attentional Selection in Multi-Talker Environments with Self-Supervised Learned Speech Representation.
    Han C; Choudhari V; Li YA; Mesgarani N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-5. PubMed ID: 38083559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speaker-independent auditory attention decoding without access to clean speech sources.
    Han C; O'Sullivan J; Luo Y; Herrero J; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    Sci Adv; 2019 May; 5(5):eaav6134. PubMed ID: 31106271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.