These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33765806)

  • 1. Loudness and short-term annoyance of sonic boom signatures at low levels.
    Töpken S; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Mar; 149(3):2004. PubMed ID: 33765806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Summary of recent NASA studies of human response to sonic booms.
    Leatherwood JD; Sullivan BM; Shepherd KP; McCurdy DA; Brown SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 2):586-98. PubMed ID: 11837964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influences of low-frequency energy and testing environment on annoyance responses to supersonic aircraft noise when heard indoors.
    Carr D; Davies P; Loubeau A; Rathsam J; Klos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jul; 148(1):414. PubMed ID: 32752738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stability of sonic boom metrics regarding signature distortions from atmospheric turbulence.
    Doebler WJ; Sparrow VW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):EL592. PubMed ID: 28679260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Underwater measurements and modeling of a sonic boom.
    Desharnais F; Chapman DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 2):544-53. PubMed ID: 11858149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sonic boom measurements: Practical implications considering ground effects, microphone installation, and weather hardening.
    Downs R; Page J; Durrant JT; Gee KL; Novakovich DJ; Anderson MC; Loubeau A
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Oct; 2(10):104001. PubMed ID: 36319210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aircraft Noise Generation and Assessment Section 5-Overall Vehicle System Noise, Part d-Sonic Boom.
    Page JA; Loubeau A
    CEAS Aeronaut J; 2019 Mar; 10(1):335-353. PubMed ID: 33505532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative annoyance and loudness judgments of various simulated sonic boom waveforms. NASA CR-1192.
    Shepherd LJ; Sutherland WW
    NASA Contract Rep NASA CR; 1968 Nov; ():1-52. PubMed ID: 5305523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Atmospheric turbulence effects on shaped and unshaped sonic boom signatures.
    Stout TA; Sparrow VW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 May; 151(5):3280. PubMed ID: 35649900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comments on "Influences of low-frequency energy and testing environment on annoyance responses to supersonic aircraft noise when heard indoors" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 148(1), 414-429 (2020)].
    Vos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):801. PubMed ID: 34470312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective loudness of "minimized" sonic boom waveforms.
    Niedzwiecki A; Ribner HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Dec; 64(6):1622-6. PubMed ID: 739097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting transmission of shaped sonic booms into a residential house structure.
    Sizov NV; Plotkin KJ; Hobbs CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3347-55. PubMed ID: 20550235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. State of the art of sonic boom modeling.
    Plotkin KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 2):530-6. PubMed ID: 11837958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Seismic detection of sonic booms.
    Cates JE; Sturtevant B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 2):614-28. PubMed ID: 11837967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise.
    Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of sonic boom propagation codes using SR-71 flight test data.
    Ivanteyeva LG; Kovalenko VV; Pavlyukov EV; Teperin LL; Rackl RG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 2):554-61. PubMed ID: 11837960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-term annoyance reactions to civil helicopter and propeller-driven aircraft noise: A laboratory experiment.
    Taghipour A; Pieren R; Schäffer B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Feb; 145(2):956. PubMed ID: 30823779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A computational analysis of sonic booms penetrating a realistic ocean surface.
    Rochat JL; Sparrow VW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):899-908. PubMed ID: 11303944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.