212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33766462)
1. Comparison between different health state utility instruments in patients with fibromyalgia.
Franco KFM; Cabral CMN; Salvador EMES; Miyamoto GC
Braz J Phys Ther; 2021; 25(5):573-582. PubMed ID: 33766462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the validity of two indirect utility instruments as measures of postoperative recovery.
Lee L; Mata J; Augustin BR; Carli F; Morin N; Latimer E; Feldman LS
J Surg Res; 2014 Jul; 190(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 24629417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of EQ-5D-5L, VAS, and SF-6D in Thai Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.
Thaweethamcharoen T; Noparatayaporn P; Sritippayawan S; Aiyasanon N
Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 May; 18():59-64. PubMed ID: 30502661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a Fracture Liaison Service.
Li N; Boonen A; van den Bergh JP; van Kuijk SMJ; Wyers CE; van Oostwaard M; Vranken L; Bours SPG; Hiligsmann M
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):829-839. PubMed ID: 35674412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with health complaints attributed to their amalgam fillings: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing amalgam removal.
Lamu AN; Björkman L; Hamre HJ; Alræk T; Musial F; Robberstad B
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Apr; 19(1):125. PubMed ID: 33865400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsiveness and minimally important difference of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Harvie HS; Honeycutt AA; Neuwahl SJ; Barber MD; Richter HE; Visco AG; Sung VW; Shepherd JP; Rogers RG; Jakus-Waldman S; Mazloomdoost D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):265.e1-265.e11. PubMed ID: 30471259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and responsiveness of EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) versus Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) questionnaire in chronic pain.
Obradovic M; Lal A; Liedgens H
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2013 Jul; 11():110. PubMed ID: 23815777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D utility measures in 813 patients with early arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.
Gaujoux-Viala C; Rat AC; Guillemin F; Flipo RM; Fardellone P; Bourgeois P; Fautrel B
J Rheumatol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1576-84. PubMed ID: 21532054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An empirical evaluation of the SF-12, SF-6D, EQ-5D and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the hand.
Dritsaki M; Petrou S; Williams M; Lamb SE
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Jan; 15(1):20. PubMed ID: 28118833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How do the EQ-5D, SF-6D and the well-being rating scale compare in patients with ankylosing spondylitis?
Boonen A; van der Heijde D; Landewé R; van Tubergen A; Mielants H; Dougados M; van der Linden S
Ann Rheum Dis; 2007 Jun; 66(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 17213254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation and comparison of EuroQoL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) among stable angina patients.
Wu J; Han Y; Zhao FL; Zhou J; Chen Z; Sun H
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Oct; 12():156. PubMed ID: 25343944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of disease severity on EQ-5D and SF-6D utility discrepancies in chronic heart failure.
Kontodimopoulos N; Argiriou M; Theakos N; Niakas D
Eur J Health Econ; 2011 Aug; 12(4):383-91. PubMed ID: 20473544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Responsiveness of the testing morbidities index in colonoscopy.
Swan JS; Hur C; Lee P; Motazedi T; Donelan K
Value Health; 2013; 16(6):1046-53. PubMed ID: 24041354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D, and comparison of their psychometric properties in a spinal postoperative Spanish population.
Selva-Sevilla C; Ferrara P; Gerónimo-Pardo M
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun; 21(4):649-662. PubMed ID: 32065301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of four different approaches to measuring health utility in depressed patients.
Turner N; Campbell J; Peters TJ; Wiles N; Hollinghurst S
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2013 May; 11():81. PubMed ID: 23659557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The responsiveness of quality of life utilities to change in depression: a comparison of instruments (SF-6D, EQ-5D, and DFD).
Gerhards SA; Huibers MJ; Theunissen KA; de Graaf LE; Widdershoven GA; Evers SM
Value Health; 2011; 14(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 21839412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation and comparison of EuroQol and short form 6D in chronic prostatitis patients.
Zhao FL; Yue M; Yang H; Wang T; Wu JH; Li SC
Value Health; 2010 Aug; 13(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 20412540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in Pompe disease.
Kanters TA; Redekop WK; Kruijshaar ME; van der Ploeg AT; Rutten-van Mölken MP; Hakkaart L
Qual Life Res; 2015 Apr; 24(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 25342117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.
Wong CKH; Lang BHH; Yu HMS; Lam CLK
Patient; 2017 Aug; 10(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 28224296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
