These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33766607)

  • 1. Application of ddPCR for detection of Enterococcus spp. in coastal water quality monitoring.
    Crain C; Kezer K; Steele S; Owiti J; Rao S; Victorio M; Austin B; Volner A; Draper W; Griffith J; Steele J; Seifert M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2021 May; 184():106206. PubMed ID: 33766607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of plasmid DNA standards for U.S. EPA fecal indicator bacteria qPCR methods by droplet digital PCR analysis.
    Sivaganesan M; Varma M; Siefring S; Haugland R
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Sep; 152():135-142. PubMed ID: 30017849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Droplet digital PCR for simultaneous quantification of general and human-associated fecal indicators for water quality assessment.
    Cao Y; Raith MR; Griffith JF
    Water Res; 2015 Mar; 70():337-49. PubMed ID: 25543243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Enterococcus species diversity in marine water and wastewater using Enterolert and EPA Method 1600.
    Ferguson DM; Griffith JF; McGee CD; Weisberg SB; Hagedorn C
    J Environ Public Health; 2013; 2013():848049. PubMed ID: 23840233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epidemiologic evaluation of multiple alternate microbial water quality monitoring indicators at three California beaches.
    Griffith JF; Weisberg SB; Arnold BF; Cao Y; Schiff KC; Colford JM
    Water Res; 2016 May; 94():371-381. PubMed ID: 27040577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Large-scale comparison of E. coli levels determined by culture and a qPCR method (EPA Draft Method C) in Michigan towards the implementation of rapid, multi-site beach testing.
    Haugland R; Oshima K; Sivaganesan M; Dufour A; Varma M; Siefring S; Nappier S; Schnitker B; Briggs S
    J Microbiol Methods; 2021 May; 184():106186. PubMed ID: 33766609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intensive water quality monitoring in a Taiwan bathing beach.
    Hsu BM; Huang YL
    Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Sep; 144(1-3):463-8. PubMed ID: 17972152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification.
    Dorevitch S; Shrestha A; DeFlorio-Barker S; Breitenbach C; Heimler I
    Environ Health; 2017 May; 16(1):45. PubMed ID: 28499453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fecal indicator bacteria levels at beaches in the Florida Keys after Hurricane Irma.
    Roca MA; Brown RS; Solo-Gabriele HM
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 Jan; 138():266-273. PubMed ID: 30660273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Enterococcus density estimates in marine beach and bay samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction, membrane filtration and defined substrate testing.
    Ferretti JA; Tran HV; Cosgrove E; Protonentis J; Loftin V; Conklin CS; Grant RN
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 May; 62(5):1066-72. PubMed ID: 21440266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-Comparison of Human Wastewater-Associated Molecular Markers in Relation to Fecal Indicator Bacteria and Enteric Viruses in Recreational Beach Waters.
    Hughes B; Beale DJ; Dennis PG; Cook S; Ahmed W
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Apr; 83(8):. PubMed ID: 28159789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting the presence of human-associated and fecal indicator real-time quantitative PCR genetic markers in urban-impacted recreational beaches.
    Molina M; Hunter S; Cyterski M; Peed LA; Kelty CA; Sivaganesan M; Mooney T; Prieto L; Shanks OC
    Water Res; 2014 Nov; 64():196-208. PubMed ID: 25061692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of pathogens and markers of fecal contamination during storm events along popular surfing beaches in San Diego, California.
    Steele JA; Blackwood AD; Griffith JF; Noble RT; Schiff KC
    Water Res; 2018 Jun; 136():137-149. PubMed ID: 29501758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Water quality, weather and environmental factors associated with fecal indicator organism density in beach sand at two recreational marine beaches.
    Heaney CD; Exum NG; Dufour AP; Brenner KP; Haugland RA; Chern E; Schwab KJ; Love DC; Serre ML; Noble R; Wade TJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Nov; 497-498():440-447. PubMed ID: 25150738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical dynamics controlling variability in nearshore fecal pollution: fecal indicator bacteria as passive particles.
    Rippy MA; Franks PJ; Feddersen F; Guza RT; Moore DF
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Jan; 66(1-2):151-7. PubMed ID: 23174305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. False-positive enterococci counts in seawater with the IDEXX Enterolert-E most probable number technique caused by Bacillus licheniformis.
    Peperzak L; van Bleijswijk J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(9):10654-10660. PubMed ID: 33098560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources.
    Rothenheber D; Jones S
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 84(17):. PubMed ID: 30006393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simultaneous monitoring of faecal indicators and harmful algae using an in-situ autonomous sensor.
    Yamahara KM; Demir-Hilton E; Preston CM; Marin R; Pargett D; Roman B; Jensen S; Birch JM; Boehm AB; Scholin CA
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 61(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 25900660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrated analyses of fecal indicator bacteria, microbial source tracking markers, and pathogens for Southeast Asian beach water quality assessment.
    Kongprajug A; Chyerochana N; Rattanakul S; Denpetkul T; Sangkaew W; Somnark P; Patarapongsant Y; Tomyim K; Sresung M; Mongkolsuk S; Sirikanchana K
    Water Res; 2021 Sep; 203():117479. PubMed ID: 34365192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of rapid quantitative PCR-based and conventional culture-based methods for enumeration of Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli in recreational waters.
    Noble RT; Blackwood AD; Griffith JF; McGee CD; Weisberg SB
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Nov; 76(22):7437-43. PubMed ID: 20870786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.