These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33768698)

  • 1. Chicago Classification update (V4.0): Technical review on diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and absent contractility.
    Gyawali CP; Zerbib F; Bhatia S; Cisternas D; Coss-Adame E; Lazarescu A; Pohl D; Yadlapati R; Penagini R; Pandolfino J
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Aug; 33(8):e14134. PubMed ID: 33768698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In ineffective esophageal motility, failed swallows are more functionally relevant than weak swallows.
    Jain A; Baker JR; Chen JW
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2018 Jun; 30(6):e13297. PubMed ID: 29368366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contraction Reserve With Ineffective Esophageal Motility on Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry is Associated With Lower Acid Exposure Times Compared With Absent Contraction Reserve.
    Quader F; Rogers B; Sievers T; Mumtaz S; Lee M; Lu T; Gyawali CP
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2020 Dec; 115(12):1981-1988. PubMed ID: 32826576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.
    Kahrilas PJ; Bredenoord AJ; Fox M; Gyawali CP; Roman S; Smout AJ; Pandolfino JE;
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):160-74. PubMed ID: 25469569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing mechanical function of peristalsis with functional lumen imaging probe panometry: Contraction power and displaced volume.
    Halder S; Pandolfino JE; Kahrilas PJ; Koop A; Schauer J; Araujo IK; Elisha G; Kou W; Patankar NA; Carlson DA
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2023 Dec; 35(12):e14692. PubMed ID: 37845833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Solid bolus swallows during high-resolution manometry complement multiple rapid swallows in predicting symptoms following antireflux surgery.
    Greenan G; Rogers BD; Sifrim D; Gyawali CP
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2022 Aug; 34(8):e14336. PubMed ID: 35195329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical usefulness of esophageal high resolution manometry and adjunctive tests: An update.
    Gyawali CP; Penagini R
    Dig Liver Dis; 2021 Nov; 53(11):1373-1380. PubMed ID: 33994122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breaks in peristaltic integrity predict abnormal esophageal bolus clearance better than contraction vigor or residual pressure at the esophagogastric junction.
    Rogers BD; Cisternas D; Rengarajan A; Marin I; Abrahao L; Hani A; Lequizamo AM; Remes-Troche JM; Perez de la Serna J; Ruiz de Leon A; Zerbib F; Serra J; Gyawali CP
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2022 Feb; 34(2):e14141. PubMed ID: 33772977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ineffective esophageal motility and bolus clearance. A study with combined high-resolution manometry and impedance in asymptomatic controls and patients.
    Zerbib F; Marin I; Cisternas D; Abrahao L; Hani A; Leguizamo AM; Remes-Troche JM; Perez de la Serna J; Ruiz de Leon A; Serra J
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2020 Sep; 32(9):e13876. PubMed ID: 32394518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fragmented and failed swallows on esophageal high-resolution manometry associate with abnormal reflux burden better than weak swallows.
    Rogers BD; Rengarajan A; Mauro A; Ghisa M; De Bortoli N; Cicala M; Ribolsi M; Penagini R; Savarino E; Gyawali CP
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2020 Feb; 32(2):e13736. PubMed ID: 31574208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of primary peristalsis, contractile reserve, and secondary peristalsis on esophageal clearance measured by timed barium esophagogram.
    Koop AH; Kahrilas PJ; Schauer J; Pandolfino JE; Carlson DA
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2023 Oct; 35(10):e14638. PubMed ID: 37417394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Prevalence of Ineffective Esophageal Motility: Impact of Chicago v4.0 vs. v3.0 Criteria.
    Surdea-Blaga T; Popa SL; Sabo CM; Fărcaş RA; David L; Ismaiel A; Dumitrascu DL; Grad S; Leucuta DC
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Sep; 60(9):. PubMed ID: 39336510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chicago Classification Version 4.0 Improves Stratification of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Patients into Clinically Meaningful Subtypes: A Two-Center International Study.
    Carmel M; Cohen DL; Hijazi B; Azzam N; Khoury T; Pagliaro M; Pesce M; Mari A
    Dysphagia; 2024 Jun; 39(3):444-451. PubMed ID: 37934251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discriminating "impaired" from "disordered" contractile response on FLIP panometry by utilizing pressure measurement.
    Chambo L; Pandolfino JE; Halder S; Kahrilas PJ; Konda V; Carlson DA
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2024 Jul; 36(7):e14818. PubMed ID: 38764235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Roles of High-resolution Manometry in Predicting Incomplete Bolus Transit in Patients With Dysphagia.
    Shi Z; Guo J; Clarke J; Jin H; Wang X; Zhang N; Stein E; Dhalla S; Pasricha PJ; Chen JDZ
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2018 Oct; 52(9):e73-e81. PubMed ID: 29095422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of a novel straight leg raise test during high-resolution manometry can predict esophageal contractile reserve in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Lei WY; Gyawali CP; Chang WC; Roman S; Wong MW; Yi CH; Liu TT; Hung JS; Liang SW; Chen CL
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Mar; 33(3):e13996. PubMed ID: 33006260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium.
    Gyawali CP; Sifrim D; Carlson DA; Hawn M; Katzka DA; Pandolfino JE; Penagini R; Roman S; Savarino E; Tatum R; Vaezi M; Clarke JO; Triadafilopoulos G
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2019 Sep; 31(9):e13584. PubMed ID: 30974032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chicago Classification update (version 4.0): Technical review on diagnostic criteria for achalasia.
    Khan A; Yadlapati R; Gonlachanvit S; Katzka DA; Park MI; Vaezi M; Vela M; Pandolfino J
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Jul; 33(7):e14182. PubMed ID: 34190376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Four-dimensional impedance manometry volume metrics for predicting abnormal bolus retention.
    Pitisuttithum P; Goudie E; Araujo IK; Halder S; Carlson DA; Pandolfino JE; Kou W
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2024 Jul; 36(7):e14803. PubMed ID: 38676387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of secondary peristalsis classification using FLIP panometry in 741 subjects undergoing manometry.
    Carlson DA; Baumann AJ; Prescott JE; Donnan EN; Yadlapati R; Khan A; Gyawali CP; Kou W; Kahrilas PJ; Pandolfino JE
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2022 Jan; 34(1):e14192. PubMed ID: 34120383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.