These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3376908)

  • 1. Arm muscle plus bone area: anthropometry and CAT scan compared.
    Forbes GB; Brown MR; Griffiths HJ
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1988 Jun; 47(6):929-31. PubMed ID: 3376908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of upper arm muscle and fat areas using electrical impedance measurements.
    Brown BH; Karatzas T; Nakielny R; Clarke RG
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988 Feb; 9(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 3359744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of an anthropometric estimate of the muscle and bone area in a transversal cross-section of the arm.
    de Koning FL; Binkhorst RA; Kauer JM; Thijssen HO
    Int J Sports Med; 1986 Oct; 7(5):246-9. PubMed ID: 3793331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The importance of the measurement of the circumference of arm, arm muscle area and skinfold thickness during puberty.
    Derman O; Yalcin SS; Kanbur NO; Kinik E
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2002; 14(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12467194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anthropometric measurement of muscle mass: revised equations for calculating bone-free arm muscle area.
    Heymsfield SB; McManus C; Smith J; Stevens V; Nixon DW
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1982 Oct; 36(4):680-90. PubMed ID: 7124671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of surface anthropometry to estimate upper-arm muscularity, including changes with body mass loss.
    Katch FI; Hortobagyi T
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1990 Oct; 52(4):591-5. PubMed ID: 2403053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anthropometric and computerized tomographic measurements of lower extremity lean body mass.
    Buckley DC; Kudsk KA; Rose BS; Fatzinger P; Koetting CA; Schlatter M
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1987 Feb; 87(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 3819239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Upper arm measurements of healthy neonates comparing ultrasonography and anthropometric methods.
    Pereira-da-Silva L; Veiga Gomes J; Clington A; Videira-Amaral JM; Bustamante SA
    Early Hum Dev; 1999 Mar; 54(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 10213290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Body composition assessed on the basis of arm circumference and triceps skinfold thickness: a new index validated in children by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rolland-Cachera MF; Brambilla P; Manzoni P; Akrout M; Sironi S; Del Maschio A; Chiumello G
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Jun; 65(6):1709-13. PubMed ID: 9174464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved prediction of body fat by measuring skinfold thickness, circumferences, and bone breadths.
    Garcia AL; Wagner K; Hothorn T; Koebnick C; Zunft HJ; Trippo U
    Obes Res; 2005 Mar; 13(3):626-34. PubMed ID: 15833949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Anthropometric and nutritional study in young adults. Evaluation of submandibular skinfold thickness].
    Fleta Zaragozano J; Moreno Aznar L; Rodríguez García L; Rodríguez Martínez G; Lario Elboj A
    Nutr Hosp; 1999; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10361811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New norms of upper limb fat and muscle areas for assessment of nutritional status.
    Frisancho AR
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1981 Nov; 34(11):2540-5. PubMed ID: 6975564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anthropometric correlates with strength performance among resistance trained athletes.
    Mayhew JL; Piper FC; Ware JS
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1993 Jun; 33(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 8412051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of thigh muscle and adipose tissue volume using magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometry.
    Tothill P; Stewart AD
    J Sports Sci; 2002 Jul; 20(7):563-76. PubMed ID: 12166882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Body composition in children based on anthropometric data. A presentation of normal values.
    Gerver WJ; de Bruin R
    Eur J Pediatr; 1996 Oct; 155(10):870-6. PubMed ID: 8891556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference values for arm muscle area, arm fat area, subscapular skinfold thickness, and sum of skinfold thicknesses for American adults.
    Bishop CW
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1984; 8(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 6541716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A radiographic method of quantifying protein-calorie undernutrition.
    Heymsfield SB; Olafson RP; Kutner MH; Nixon DW
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1979 Mar; 32(3):693-702. PubMed ID: 105625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of mid-arm muscular area measured by anthropometry in nonobese patients with increased muscle atrophy and variation of subcutaneous fat thickness.
    Saito R; Ohkawa S; Ichinose S; Nishikino M; Ikegaya N; Kumagai H
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2010 Aug; 64(8):899-904. PubMed ID: 20502470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of triceps skinfold and upper arm circumference measurements taken in standard and supine positions.
    Jensen TG; Dudrick SJ; Johnston DA
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1981; 5(6):519-21. PubMed ID: 7199591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of upper arm measurements used in nutritional assessment.
    Burgert SL; Anderson CF
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1979 Oct; 32(10):2136-42. PubMed ID: 484532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.