209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33769125)
1. A study of smile aesthetic perception among dental professionals, patients and parents towards impacted maxillary canine treatment options.
Seager L; Shah J; Burke T; Khambay B
J Orthod; 2021 Sep; 48(3):250-259. PubMed ID: 33769125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of symmetric and asymmetric alterations of maxillary canine gingival margin on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists, dentists, and laypersons.
Katiyar S; Gandhi S; Sodawala J; Anita G; Hamdani S; Jain S
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):586-591. PubMed ID: 28169254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extraction of maxillary canines: Esthetic perceptions of patient smiles among dental professionals and laypeople.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Javidi H; Griffiths SE; Shah AA; Sandler J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):509-515. PubMed ID: 28962736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of nasal deviation on the perception of maxillary dental centreline and smile aesthetics.
Grimes K; Fleming PS; Sharma PK
J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 50(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 35527703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of canine characteristics and symmetry on perceived smile attractiveness when canine teeth are substituted for lateral incisors.
Rayner WJ; Barber SK; Spencer RJ
J Orthod; 2015 Mar; 42(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 25808380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of buccolingual inclinations of maxillary canines and premolars on perceived smile attractiveness.
Xu H; Han X; Wang Y; Shu R; Jing Y; Tian Y; Andrews WA; Andrews LF; Bai D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 25636551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The perception of smile attractiveness to altered vertical position of maxillary anteriors by various groups.
Babeer WA; Bakhsh ZT; Natto ZS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Mar; 101(9):e28660. PubMed ID: 35244035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Morphological features of smile attractiveness and related factors influence perception and gingival aesthetic parameters.
Pham TAV; Nguyen PA
Int Dent J; 2022 Feb; 72(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 33707026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of maxillary canine gingival margin asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
Correa BD; Vieira Bittencourt MA; Machado AW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24373655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the presence of unilateral gingival recession on maxillary canines influence smile esthetics?
Figueiredo BA; Ribeiro JBP; Machado AW
Dental Press J Orthod; 2020; 25(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32215478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons.
Kumar S; Gandhi S; Valiathan A
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):295. PubMed ID: 22945732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptions of Dentists and Non-Professionals on Some Dental Factors Affecting Smile Aesthetics: A Study from Vietnam.
Ngoc VTN; Tran DK; Dung TM; Anh NV; Nga VT; Anh LQ; Hanh NTT; Phuong LN; Quynh HN; Chu DT
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 32138374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Orthodontists' and laypeople's perception of smile height aesthetics in relation to varying degrees of transverse cant of anterior teeth.
Shiyan H; Xu Q; Shuhao X; Nanquan R; Xiaobing L
Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 27468592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of gingival margin asymmetries on the smile esthetic perception of dental professionals and lay people.
Koseoglu M; Bayindir F
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jul; 32(5):480-486. PubMed ID: 32596944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Canine substitution for missing maxillary lateral incisors: the influence of canine morphology, size, and shade on perceptions of smile attractiveness.
Brough E; Donaldson AN; Naini FB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):705.e1-9; discussion 705-7. PubMed ID: 21130320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics in cases with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors.
Rosa M; Olimpo A; Fastuca R; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():34. PubMed ID: 24325825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of smile esthetics varies between patients and dental professionals when recession defects are present.
Musskopf ML; Rocha JM; Rösing CK
Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 24173262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Influence of Varying Gingival Display of Maxillary Anterior Teeth on the Perceptions of Smile Aesthetics.
Sybaite J; Sharma P; Fine P; Blizard R; Leung A
J Dent; 2020 Dec; 103():103504. PubMed ID: 33129999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of maxillary canine torque variations on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
Lemos TCB; Vasconcelos JB; Santos BMD; Machado AW
Dental Press J Orthod; 2019; 24(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 30916249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of lightness difference of single anterior tooth to smile attractiveness.
Ntovas P; Diamantopoulou S; Gogolas N; Sarri V; Papandreou A; Sakellaridi E; Petrakos G; Papazoglou E
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Sep; 33(6):856-864. PubMed ID: 33264491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
