287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33769170)
1. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.
Ahmadi O; Louw J; Leinonen H; Gan PYC
Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 35(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 33769170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of readability and reliability of online patient information for intracranial aneurysms.
Patel CB; Kerr N; Ahmadi O; Muthu T
ANZ J Surg; 2022 Apr; 92(4):843-847. PubMed ID: 34967087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Information for Patients and Their Families Regarding Schizophrenia.
Ekinci O; Koyuncu AN
J Nerv Ment Dis; 2024 May; 212(5):278-283. PubMed ID: 38416420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How readable and quality are online patient education materials about Helicobacter pylori?: Assessment of the readability, quality and reliability.
Yilmaz Hanci S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35543. PubMed ID: 37904459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?
Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Bader E; Hoeltzel GD; Joshi ART; Williams NN; Dumon KR
Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e195-e200. PubMed ID: 36588086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Readability and quality of online information for patients pertaining to revision knee arthroplasty: An objective analysis.
Murphy B; Irwin S; Condon F; Kennedy C
Surgeon; 2022 Dec; 20(6):e366-e370. PubMed ID: 35034835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
Özduran E; Hanci V
Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability, reliability and credibility of online patient information on skin grafts.
Heaven CL; Patel C; Ahmadi O; Mathy JA
Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Feb; 64(1):e57-e64. PubMed ID: 36354108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability of Internet Websites about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Saleh D; Fisher JH; Provencher S; Liang Z; Ryerson CJ; Weatherald J
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1404-1413. PubMed ID: 34813417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?
Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK
Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.
Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A
Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality and readability of online information on hand osteoarthritis.
Hong SW; Kang JH; Park JH; Park HJ; Kim E
Health Informatics J; 2023; 29(1):14604582231169297. PubMed ID: 36995242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.
Mac OA; Thayre A; Tan S; Dodd RH
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e16701. PubMed ID: 32442134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
