BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33769849)

  • 1. Effect of Training With Anchors on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia in Speech-Language Pathology Students.
    Wong DW; Chan RW; Wu CH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 64(4):1136-1156. PubMed ID: 33769849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
    Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory Training With Synthesized Voice Anchors: Effects on Rater Agreement.
    Gama ACC; da Mata SM; Martins Dos Santos PC; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Quinino RDC
    J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):366-375. PubMed ID: 34702611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
    Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing auditory-perceptual judgment reliability in otolaryngology residents.
    Misono S; Merati AL; Eadie TL
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 22019147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of Foreign Language Accent on Expert Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Evaluations of Dysphonia.
    Marks KL; Dahl KL; Stepp CE
    Laryngoscope; 2024 May; 134(5):2272-2276. PubMed ID: 37942827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory Skills as a Predictor of Rater Reliability in the Evaluation of Vocal Quality.
    Avelino de Paiva MA; Diniz da Rosa MR; Gielow I; Marinho da Silva I; da Silva Sousa ES; França da Silva AC; Costa Silva PO; Lopes LW
    J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):559-569. PubMed ID: 31879240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
    Lu FL; Matteson S
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of listener experience, measurement scale and speech task on the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.
    Alves JDN; Almeida AAF; Yamasaki R; Lopes LW
    Codas; 2024; 36(3):e20230175. PubMed ID: 38629682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Anchors and Training on the Reliability of Voice Quality Ratings for Different Types of Speech Stimuli.
    Brinca L; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Pinto PN; Araújo L
    J Voice; 2015 Nov; 29(6):776.e7-14. PubMed ID: 25795348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation.
    Chan KM; Yiu EM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 45(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 14748643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of immediate feedback on learning auditory perceptual voice quality evaluation.
    Chan KM; Li M; Law TY; Yiu EM
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 Aug; 14(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 22646315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Visual Sort and Rate Versus Visual Analog Scales on the Reliability of Judgments of Dysphonia.
    Kapsner-Smith MR; Opuszynski A; Stepp CE; Eadie TL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 May; 64(5):1571-1580. PubMed ID: 33909472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical versus laboratory ratings of voice using the CAPE-V.
    Solomon NP; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):e7-14. PubMed ID: 20430573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The effect of anchor voices and visible speech in training in the GRABS scale of perceptual evaluation of dysphonia].
    Núñez-Batalla F; Díaz-Molina JP; García-López I; Moreno-Méndez A; Costales-Marcos M; Moreno-Galindo C; Martínez-Camblor P
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2012; 63(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 22153964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual evaluation of severe pediatric voice disorders: rater reliability using the consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice.
    Kelchner LN; Brehm SB; Weinrich B; Middendorf J; deAlarcon A; Levin L; Elluru R
    J Voice; 2010 Jul; 24(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 19135856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
    Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
    J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonic voices: can a training protocol lead to the development of perceptual categories?
    Ghio A; Dufour S; Wengler A; Pouchoulin G; Revis J; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 25516201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.