306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33771496)
1. Six versus twelve hours of single-balloon catheter placement with oxytocin administration for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lassey SC; Haber HR; Kanbergs A; Robinson JN; Little SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):611.e1-611.e8. PubMed ID: 33771496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Six compared with 12 hours of Foley balloon placement for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervices: a randomized controlled trial.
Appadurai U; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101157. PubMed ID: 37722505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial.
Kamarudzman N; Omar SZ; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101142. PubMed ID: 37643690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical ripening balloon with and without oxytocin in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.
Bauer AM; Lappen JR; Gecsi KS; Hackney DN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 219(3):294.e1-294.e6. PubMed ID: 29763609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial.
Sarreau M; Isly H; Poulain P; Fontaine B; Morel O; Villemonteix P; Mares P; Mousty E; Godard A; Ragot S; Pierre F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Feb; 99(2):259-266. PubMed ID: 31432510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double-Balloon Device for 6 Compared With 12 Hours for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Bleicher I; Dikopoltsev E; Kadour-Ferro E; Sammour R; Gonen R; Sagi S; Eshel A; Nussam L; Vitner D
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 135(5):1153-1160. PubMed ID: 32282603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intracervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for labor induction with Bishop score ≤3: a secondary analysis.
Gagnon J; Corlin T; Berghella V; Hoffman MK; Sciscione A; Marie PS; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jul; 3(4):100350. PubMed ID: 33757937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of labor via Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unfavorable cervices: a randomized controlled trial.
Yogamoorthy U; Saaid R; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101158. PubMed ID: 37734661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tension compared to no tension on a Foley transcervical catheter for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Fruhman G; Gavard JA; Amon E; Flick KV; Miller C; Gross GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):67.e1-67.e9. PubMed ID: 27640940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mifepristone vs balloon catheter for labor induction in previous cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Sharma C; Soni A; Gupta A; Verma A; Verma S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Aug; 296(2):241-248. PubMed ID: 28624988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized trial of Foley balloon induction of labor trial in nulliparas (FIAT-N).
Connolly KA; Kohari KS; Rekawek P; Smilen BS; Miller MR; Moshier E; Factor SH; Stone JL; Bianco AT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):392.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27018464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
Viteri OA; Tabsh KK; Alrais MA; Salazar XC; Lopez JM; Fok RY; Chauhan SP; Sibai BM
Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e123-e128. PubMed ID: 32299108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review.
Cheuk QK; Lo TK; Lee CP; Yeung AP
Hong Kong Med J; 2015 Jun; 21(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 25999032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter.
Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Uccella S; Agosti M; Serati M; Marchitelli G; Bolis P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 207(2):125.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22704766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association of Early Amniotomy After Foley Balloon Catheter Ripening and Duration of Nulliparous Labor Induction.
Battarbee AN; Palatnik A; Peress DA; Grobman WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 128(3):592-597. PubMed ID: 27500341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
