176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33771557)
1. Single-pass 1-needle actuation versus single-pass 3-needle actuation technique for EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: a randomized prospective trial (with video).
Ching-Companioni RA; Johal AS; Confer BD; Forster E; Khara HS; Diehl DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Sep; 94(3):551-558. PubMed ID: 33771557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 19 G aspiration needle versus 19 G core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a prospective randomized trial.
Ching-Companioni RA; Diehl DL; Johal AS; Confer BD; Khara HS
Endoscopy; 2019 Nov; 51(11):1059-1065. PubMed ID: 31342474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Two Specialized Histology Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Pilot Study.
Hashimoto R; Lee DP; Samarasena JB; Chandan VS; Guo W; Lee JG; Chang KJ
Dig Dis Sci; 2021 May; 66(5):1700-1706. PubMed ID: 32556821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing a 19-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle with a 22-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle for EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: a prospective randomized study.
Diehl DL; Sangwan V; Johal AS; Khara HS; Confer B
Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Jun; 99(6):931-937. PubMed ID: 38141686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy using a single-pass, slow-pull technique with a 19-G Franseen tip fine-needle biopsy needle: A prospective study.
Rai P; Majeed A; Kumar P; Rajput M; Goel A; Rao RN
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jun; 42(3):418-424. PubMed ID: 37097513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparative Study of 22G versus 19G Needles for EUS-Guided Biopsies for Parenchymal Liver Disease: Are Thinner Needles Better?
Patel HK; Saxena R; Rush N; Patel SK; Dasari CS; Mneimneh W; Quickery A; Rahal MA; Temnykh L; DeWitt J; Al-Haddad M
Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Jan; 66(1):238-246. PubMed ID: 32128647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective pilot comparison of wet and dry heparinized suction for EUS-guided liver biopsy (with videos).
Mok SRS; Diehl DL; Johal AS; Khara HS; Confer BD; Mudireddy PR; Kirchner HL; Chen ZE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Dec; 88(6):919-925. PubMed ID: 30120956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy using a 22-G fine needle biopsy needle: a prospective study.
Hasan MK; Kadkhodayan K; Idrisov E; Ali S; Rafiq E; Ben-Ami Shor D; Abdel-Jalil A; Navaneethan U; Bang J; Varadarajulu S; Hawes R; Pernicone P
Endoscopy; 2019 Sep; 51(9):818-824. PubMed ID: 31365947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EUS-guided fine-needle core liver biopsy sampling using a novel 19-gauge needle with modified 1-pass, 1 actuation wet suction technique.
Nieto J; Khaleel H; Challita Y; Jimenez M; Baron TH; Walters L; Hathaway K; Patel K; Lankarani A; Herman M; Holloman D; Saab S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Feb; 87(2):469-475. PubMed ID: 28551024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles.
Shah RM; Schmidt J; John E; Rastegari S; Acharya P; Kedia P
Clin Endosc; 2021 Sep; 54(5):739-744. PubMed ID: 33189102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, head-to-head comparison of 2 EUS-guided liver biopsy needles in vivo.
Aggarwal SN; Magdaleno T; Klocksieben F; MacFarlan JE; Goonewardene S; Zator Z; Shah S; Shah HN
Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 May; 93(5):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 33045222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques.
Schulman AR; Thompson CC; Odze R; Chan WW; Ryou M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Feb; 85(2):419-426. PubMed ID: 27530070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EUS-guided liver biopsy for parenchymal disease: a comparison of diagnostic yield between two core biopsy needles.
Sey MS; Al-Haddad M; Imperiale TF; McGreevy K; Lin J; DeWitt JM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Feb; 83(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 26278654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mohan BP; Shakhatreh M; Garg R; Ponnada S; Adler DG
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):238-246.e3. PubMed ID: 30389469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction.
Stavropoulos SN; Im GY; Jlayer Z; Harris MD; Pitea TC; Turi GK; Malet PF; Friedel DM; Grendell JH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Feb; 75(2):310-8. PubMed ID: 22248599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.
Kim GH; Cho YK; Kim EY; Kim HK; Cho JW; Lee TH; Moon JS;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24325591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
