158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33772738)
1. Optimal relaxation parameters of dynamic row-action maximum likelihood algorithm and post-smoothing filter for image reconstruction of dedicated breast PET.
Satoh Y; Imai M; Hirata K; Asakawa Y; Ikegawa C; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 May; 35(5):608-616. PubMed ID: 33772738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of dedicated breast positron emission tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography images: a common phantom study.
Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 31768819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Organ-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Scanners for Breast Imaging: Comparison between the Performances of Prior and Novel Models.
Satoh Y; Hanaoka K; Ikegawa C; Imai M; Watanabe S; Morimoto-Ishikawa D; Onishi H; Ito T; Komoike Y; Ishii K
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of radioactivity outside the field of view on image quality of dedicated breast positron emission tomography: preliminary phantom and clinical studies.
Satoh Y; Imai M; Ikegawa C; Hirata K; Abo N; Kusuzaki M; Oyama-Manabe N; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Dec; 36(12):1010-1018. PubMed ID: 36207497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dynamic row-action maximum likelihood algorithm reconstruction for quantitative 15O brain PET.
Ibaraki M; Sato K; Mizuta T; Kitamura K; Miura S; Sugawara S; Shinohara Y; Kinoshita T
Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Sep; 23(7):627-38. PubMed ID: 19562437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phantom-based acquisition time and image reconstruction parameter optimisation for oncologic FDG PET/CT examinations using a digital system.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; Brahmer A; Mavroeidi IA; Zarrad F; Umutlu L; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Seifert R; Sraieb M; Weber M; Kersting D
BMC Cancer; 2022 Aug; 22(1):899. PubMed ID: 35978274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of image quality at the detector's edge of dedicated breast positron emission tomography.
Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Omiya Y; Onishi H
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Jan; 8(1):5. PubMed ID: 33462645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance evaluation of a high resolution dedicated breast PET scanner.
García Hernández T; Vicedo González A; Ferrer Rebolleda J; Sánchez Jurado R; Roselló Ferrando J; Brualla González L; Granero Cabañero D; Del Puig Cozar Santiago M
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2261. PubMed ID: 27147338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Higher breast cancer conspicuity on dbPET compared to WB-PET/CT.
Nishimatsu K; Nakamoto Y; Miyake KK; Ishimori T; Kanao S; Toi M; Togashi K
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():138-145. PubMed ID: 28583624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Quantitative evaluation of block-iterative reconstruction image in PET: comparison of the dynamic RAMLA algorithm and OSEM algorithm].
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Shimizu K; Murase K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Oct; 63(10):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18187896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
Akamatsu G; Shimada N; Matsumoto K; Daisaki H; Suzuki K; Watabe H; Oda K; Senda M; Terauchi T; Tateishi U
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):144-161. PubMed ID: 35029817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image quality evaluation of real low-dose breast PET.
Satoh Y; Imai M; Ikegawa C; Onishi H
Jpn J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):1186-1193. PubMed ID: 35612727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimisation of the OS-EM algorithm and comparison with FBP for image reconstruction on a dual-head camera: a phantom and a clinical 18F-FDG study.
Gutman F; Gardin I; Delahaye N; Rakotonirina H; Hitzel A; Manrique A; Le Guludec D; Véra P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 14579091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reduction of the fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose dose for clinically dedicated breast positron emission tomography.
Satoh Y; Sekine T; Omiya Y; Onishi H; Motosugi U
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Nov; 6(1):21. PubMed ID: 31784863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography?
Wu Z; Guo B; Huang B; Zhao B; Qin Z; Hao X; Liang M; Xie J; Li S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):224-233. PubMed ID: 33683004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer detection by dedicated breast positron emission tomography according to the World Health Organization classification of breast tumors.
Sasada S; Kimura Y; Masumoto N; Emi A; Kadoya T; Arihiro K; Okada M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1588-1592. PubMed ID: 33685728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal relaxation parameters of DRAMA (dynamic RAMLA) aiming at one-pass image reconstruction for 3D-PET.
Tanaka E; Kudo H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 May; 55(10):2917-39. PubMed ID: 20436235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
