BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33773601)

  • 1. MAML1: a coregulator that alters endometrial epithelial cell adhesive capacity.
    Zafir S; Zhou W; Menkhorst E; Santos L; Dimitriadis E
    Fertil Res Pract; 2021 Mar; 7(1):8. PubMed ID: 33773601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of the role for cadherin 6 in the regulation of human endometrial receptivity.
    Zhou W; Santos L; Dimitriadis E
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2020 Jun; 18(1):66. PubMed ID: 32600462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jagged1 regulates endometrial receptivity in both humans and mice.
    Zhou W; Menkhorst E; Dimitriadis E
    FASEB J; 2021 Aug; 35(8):e21784. PubMed ID: 34252231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tripeptidyl peptidase I promotes human endometrial epithelial cell adhesive capacity implying a role in receptivity.
    Santos LL; Ling CK; Dimitriadis E
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2020 Dec; 18(1):124. PubMed ID: 33317560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. miR-23b-3p regulates human endometrial epithelial cell adhesion implying a role in implantation.
    Barton S; Zhou W; Santos LL; Menkhorst E; Yang G; Tinn Teh W; Ang C; Lucky T; Dimitriadis E
    Reproduction; 2023 Apr; 165(4):407-416. PubMed ID: 36757298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Podocalyxin is a key negative regulator of human endometrial epithelial receptivity for embryo implantation.
    Paule SG; Heng S; Samarajeewa N; Li Y; Mansilla M; Webb AI; Nebl T; Young SL; Lessey BA; Hull ML; Scelwyn M; Lim R; Vollenhoven B; Rombauts LJ; Nie G
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1353-1366. PubMed ID: 33822049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mouse double minute homologue 2 (MDM2) downregulation by miR-661 impairs human endometrial epithelial cell adhesive capacity.
    Winship A; Ton A; Van Sinderen M; Menkhorst E; Rainczuk K; Griffiths M; Cuman C; Dimitriadis E
    Reprod Fertil Dev; 2018 Mar; 30(3):477-486. PubMed ID: 28847363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chloride intracellular channel 4 is dysregulated in endometrium of women with infertility and alters receptivity.
    Ling CK; Santos LL; Zhou W; Dimitriadis E
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2020 Oct; 531(4):490-496. PubMed ID: 32807494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. miR-29c overexpression and COL4A1 downregulation in infertile human endometrium reduces endometrial epithelial cell adhesive capacity in vitro implying roles in receptivity.
    Griffiths M; Van Sinderen M; Rainczuk K; Dimitriadis E
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):8644. PubMed ID: 31201347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction of human trophoblast cells with gland-like endometrial spheroids: a model system for trophoblast invasion.
    Buck VU; Gellersen B; Leube RE; Classen-Linke I
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Apr; 30(4):906-16. PubMed ID: 25662813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decreased PECAM1-mediated TGF-β1 expression in the mid-secretory endometrium in women with recurrent implantation failure.
    Guo F; Si C; Zhou M; Wang J; Zhang D; Leung PCK; Xu B; Zhang A
    Hum Reprod; 2018 May; 33(5):832-843. PubMed ID: 29617817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proteomic Insights into Endometrial Receptivity and Embryo-Endometrial Epithelium Interaction for Implantation Reveal Critical Determinants of Fertility.
    Evans J; Hutchison J; Salamonsen LA; Greening DW
    Proteomics; 2020 Jan; 20(1):e1900250. PubMed ID: 31825151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcriptomic analysis of the interaction of choriocarcinoma spheroids with receptive vs. non-receptive endometrial epithelium cell lines: an in vitro model for human implantation.
    Vergaro P; Tiscornia G; Rodríguez A; Santaló J; Vassena R
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 May; 36(5):857-873. PubMed ID: 30972518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soluble Delta-like ligand 1 alters human endometrial epithelial cell adhesive capacity.
    Van Sinderen M; Oyanedel J; Menkhorst E; Cuman C; Rainczuk K; Winship A; Salamonsen L; Edgell T; Dimitriadis E
    Reprod Fertil Dev; 2017 Apr; 29(4):694-702. PubMed ID: 26616664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis.
    Enciso M; Carrascosa JP; Sarasa J; Martínez-Ortiz PA; Munné S; Horcajadas JA; Aizpurua J
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 29315421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implantation in the baboon: endometrial responses.
    Fazleabas AT; Kim JJ; Srinivasan S; Donnelly KM; Brudney A; Jaffe RC
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1999; 17(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 10797944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expression of membrane protein disulphide isomerase A1 (PDIA1) disrupt a reducing microenvironment in endometrial epithelium for embryo implantation.
    Fernando SR; Lee CL; Wong BP; Cheng KW; Lee YL; Chan MC; Ng EH; Yeung WS; Lee KF
    Exp Cell Res; 2021 Aug; 405(2):112665. PubMed ID: 34111473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel "embryo-endometrial" adhesion model can potentially predict "receptive" or "non-receptive" endometrium.
    Evans J; Walker KJ; Bilandzic M; Kinnear S; Salamonsen LA
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Jan; 37(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 31776756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of potential biomarkers of pre-receptive and receptive endometrium in uterine fluid and a functional evaluation of the potential role of CSF3 in fertility.
    Edgell TA; Evans J; Lazzaro L; Boyes K; Sridhar M; Catt S; Rombauts LJF; Vollenhoven BJ; Salamonsen LA
    Cytokine; 2018 Nov; 111():222-229. PubMed ID: 30195213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decreased NOTCH1 signaling activated autophagy in the mid-secretory endometrium of patients with recurrent implantation failure†.
    Yang Z; Li Q; Yuan F; Wang M; Zhang R; Chen Y; Fu W; Yang Q; Hu L
    Biol Reprod; 2023 Jun; 108(6):974-987. PubMed ID: 36930053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.