These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33774569)

  • 1. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
    Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The double-swab technique versus single swabs for human DNA recovery from various surfaces.
    Hedman J; Jansson L; Akel Y; Wallmark N; Gutierrez Liljestrand R; Forsberg C; Ansell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102253. PubMed ID: 32007674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of swab material on microbial surface sampling.
    Jansson L; Akel Y; Eriksson R; Lavander M; Hedman J
    J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Sep; 176():106006. PubMed ID: 32721418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
    Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs.
    Bruijns BB; Tiggelaar RM; Gardeniers H
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 29890011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms.
    Wise NM; Wagner SJ; Worst TJ; Sprague JE; Oechsle CM
    Microbiologyopen; 2021 Nov; 10(6):e1244. PubMed ID: 34964289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New technique to take samples from environmental surfaces using flocked nylon swabs.
    Hedin G; Rynbäck J; Loré B
    J Hosp Infect; 2010 Aug; 75(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 20451296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
    Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
    Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of a Sonicating Swab for Removal and Capture of Microorganisms from Experimental and Natural Contaminated Surfaces.
    Ahnrud GP; Mendoza AJ; Hurley MJ; Marek PJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 May; 84(9):. PubMed ID: 29500264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of swabbing technique and duration on forensic DNA recovery.
    Abdullah A; Szkuta B; Meakin GE
    Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):343-348. PubMed ID: 37169459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantage of ForensiX Swabs in Retrieving and Preserving Biological Fluids.
    Mawlood SK; Alrowaithi M; Watson N
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):686-9. PubMed ID: 25684353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
    Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of an ELISA for evaluation of swab recovery efficiencies of bovine serum albumin.
    Sparding N; Slotved HC; Nicolaisen GM; Giese SB; Elmlund J; Steenhard NR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112876. PubMed ID: 25402464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of swabbing solution and swab type on DNA recovery from rigid environmental surfaces.
    You HS; Lee SH; Ok YJ; Kang HG; Sung HJ; Lee JY; Kang SS; Hyun SH
    J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Jun; 161():12-17. PubMed ID: 31004622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
    Pang BC; Cheung BK
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
    Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.