These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33775142)

  • 1. Uncertainty quantification of dynamic earthquake rupture simulations.
    Daub EG; Arabnejad H; Mahmood I; Groen D
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200076. PubMed ID: 33775142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. VECMAtk: a scalable verification, validation and uncertainty quantification toolkit for scientific simulations.
    Groen D; Arabnejad H; Jancauskas V; Edeling WN; Jansson F; Richardson RA; Lakhlili J; Veen L; Bosak B; Kopta P; Wright DW; Monnier N; Karlshoefer P; Suleimenova D; Sinclair R; Vassaux M; Nikishova A; Bieniek M; Luk OO; Kulczewski M; Raffin E; Crommelin D; Hoenen O; Coster DP; Piontek T; Coveney PV
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200221. PubMed ID: 33775151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty quantification patterns for multiscale models.
    Ye D; Veen L; Nikishova A; Lakhlili J; Edeling W; Luk OO; Krzhizhanovskaya VV; Hoekstra AG
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200072. PubMed ID: 33775139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards validated multiscale simulations for fusion.
    Luk OO; Lakhlili J; Hoenen O; von Toussaint U; Scott BD; Coster DP
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200074. PubMed ID: 33775143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing uncertainties from physical parameters and modelling choices in an atmospheric large eddy simulation model.
    Jansson F; Edeling W; Attema J; Crommelin D
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200073. PubMed ID: 33775144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uncertainty quantification in classical molecular dynamics.
    Wan S; Sinclair RC; Coveney PV
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200082. PubMed ID: 33775140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data-driven Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Human Head Models.
    Upadhyay K; Giovanis DG; Alshareef A; Knutsen AK; Johnson CL; Carass A; Bayly PV; Shields MD; Ramesh KT
    Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng; 2022 Aug; 398():. PubMed ID: 37994358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of uncertainty quantification in model reproducibility.
    Volodina V; Challenor P
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200071. PubMed ID: 33775141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Seismological asperities from the point of view of dynamic rupture modeling: the 2007 Mw6.6 Chuetsu-Oki, Japan, earthquake.
    Aochi H; Yoshimi M
    J Seismol; 2016; 20(4):1089-1105. PubMed ID: 28190967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning from reproducing computational results: introducing three principles and the
    Krafczyk MS; Shi A; Bhaskar A; Marinov D; Stodden V
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200069. PubMed ID: 33775145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Cardiac Action Potential Models.
    Pathmanathan P; Cordeiro JM; Gray RA
    Front Physiol; 2019; 10():721. PubMed ID: 31297060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty quantification for radiation measurements: Bottom-up error variance estimation using calibration information.
    Burr T; Croft S; Krieger T; Martin K; Norman C; Walsh S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Feb; 108():49-57. PubMed ID: 26698221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity-driven simulation development: a case study in forced migration.
    Suleimenova D; Arabnejad H; Edeling WN; Groen D
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200077. PubMed ID: 33775152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cascadia megathrust earthquake rupture model constrained by geodetic fault locking.
    Li D; Liu Y
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2196):20200135. PubMed ID: 33715408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The case for free and open source software in research and scholarship.
    Fortunato L; Galassi M
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200079. PubMed ID: 33775148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calibration of Cohorts of Virtual Patient Heart Models Using Bayesian History Matching.
    Rodero C; Longobardi S; Augustin C; Strocchi M; Plank G; Lamata P; Niederer SA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Jan; 51(1):241-252. PubMed ID: 36271218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using UncertainSCI to Quantify Uncertainty in Cardiac Simulations.
    Rupp LC; Liu Z; Bergquist JA; Rampersad S; White D; Tate JD; Brooks DH; Narayan A; MacLeod RS
    Comput Cardiol (2010); 2020 Sep; 47():. PubMed ID: 36845870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre-P gravity signals from dynamic earthquake rupture: modelling and observations.
    Kame N
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2196):20200136. PubMed ID: 33715416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.