These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33775289)

  • 21. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study.
    Casagrande L; Laske M; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MCDNJM; Opdam NJM
    J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():30-36. PubMed ID: 28602850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Repair or replacement of restorations: do we accept built in obsolescence or do we improve the evidence?
    Sharif MO; Fedorowicz Z; Tickle M; Brunton PA
    Br Dent J; 2010 Aug; 209(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 20798721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attitudes of Greek dentists towards repair of conservative restorations. An online survey.
    Maria A; Charikleia P; Panagiotis L
    Int Dent J; 2017 Dec; 67(6):351-359. PubMed ID: 28736971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Apr; 62(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 15198387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
    Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2001 Apr; 59(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 11370750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Gordan VV; Litaker MS; Funkhouser E; Fellows JL; Shamp DG; Qvist V; Meral JS; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Jun; 144(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 23729455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How dentists diagnose and treat defective restorations: evidence from the dental practice-based research network.
    Gordan VV; Garvan CW; Richman JS; Fellows JL; Rindal DB; Qvist V; Heft MW; Williams OD; Gilbert GH;
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):664-73. PubMed ID: 19953775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Teaching students the repair of resin-based composite restorations: a survey of North American dental schools.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Blum IR; Wilson N
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 134(3):317-23; quiz 338-9. PubMed ID: 12699045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Teaching of composite restoration repair in Brazilian dental schools.
    Girotto LPDS; Chisini LA; Lynch CD; Blum IR; Wilson NH; Sarkis-Onofre R; Carvalho RV; van de Sande FH
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104410. PubMed ID: 36626975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harnekar SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD004483. PubMed ID: 27748505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations.
    Eltahlah D; Lynch CD; Chadwick BL; Blum IR; Wilson NHF
    J Dent; 2018 May; 72():1-7. PubMed ID: 29522787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Amalgam--Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam.
    Wahl MJ
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):525-35. PubMed ID: 11495565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Jan; 55(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 9083578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 1: direct composite restorations.
    Blum IR; Jagger DC; Wilson NH
    Dent Update; 2011 Mar; 38(2):78-80, 82-4. PubMed ID: 21500616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom.
    Wilson NH; Burke FJ; Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10332373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mondragon E; Garvan CW; Mjör IA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 21719808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.