150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33775528)
1. External validation and comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-based predictive models for clinically significant prostate cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee A; Yang XY; Law YM; Huang HH; Lau WK; Lee LS; Ho HS; Cheng CW; Yuen JS; Tay KJ; Chen K
Urol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):783.e1-783.e10. PubMed ID: 33775528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External validation of novel magnetic resonance imaging-based models for prostate cancer prediction.
Püllen L; Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Wetter A; Guberina N; Pandey A; Hüttenbrink C; Tschirdewahn S; Pahernik S; Hadaschik BA; Distler FA
BJU Int; 2020 Mar; 125(3):407-416. PubMed ID: 31758738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of prostate cancer prediction models in men undergoing both magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal biopsy: Are the models still relevant?
Doan P; Graham P; Lahoud J; Remmers S; Roobol MJ; Kim L; Patel MI
BJU Int; 2021 Dec; 128 Suppl 3():36-44. PubMed ID: 34374190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy: MRI-based Risk Models versus a PI-RADS and PSA Density Strategy for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Deniffel D; Healy GM; Dong X; Ghai S; Salinas-Miranda E; Fleshner N; Hamilton R; Kulkarni G; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Perlis N; Haider MA
Radiology; 2021 Aug; 300(2):369-379. PubMed ID: 34032510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prostate biopsy risk calculator based on MRI: development and comparison of the Prospective Loyola University multiparametric MRI (PLUM) and Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) risk calculators.
Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Fang AM; Gerena M; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Rais-Bahrami S; Gupta GN
BJU Int; 2023 Feb; 131(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 35733400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External validation of two MRI-based risk calculators in prostate cancer diagnosis.
Petersmann AL; Remmers S; Klein T; Manava P; Huettenbrink C; Pahernik SA; Distler FA
World J Urol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):4109-4116. PubMed ID: 34169337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Novel Risk Calculator Incorporating Clinical Parameters, Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification Before Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.
Kelly BD; Ptasznik G; Roberts MJ; Doan P; Stricker P; Thompson J; Buteau J; Chen K; Alghazo O; O'Brien JS; Hofman MS; Frydenberg M; Lawrentschuk N; Lundon D; Murphy DG; Emmett L; Moon D
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2023 Jul; 53():90-97. PubMed ID: 37441340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical significance of prostate cancer identified by transperineal standard template biopsy in men with nonsuspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Dahl DM; Wu S; Lin SX; Hu M; Barney AA; Kim MM; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Feldman AS; Wu CL
Urol Oncol; 2024 Feb; 42(2):28.e21-28.e28. PubMed ID: 38182499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical utility of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy in patients with lower suspicion lesions on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Lokeshwar SD; Nguyen J; Rahman SN; Khajir G; Ho R; Ghabili K; Leapman MS; Weinreb JC; Sprenkle PC
Urol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):407.e21-407.e27. PubMed ID: 35811206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Castellani D; Cecchini S; Mazzucchelli R; Soraci L; Di Rosa M; Fabbietti P; Palagonia E; Puccio F; Carnevali F; Paci E; Montironi R; Galosi AB
Urol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 40(8):379.e1-379.e8. PubMed ID: 35662497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Risk Calculators to Predict Prostate Cancer Risk.
Patel HD; Remmers S; Ellis JL; Li EV; Roobol MJ; Fang AM; Davik P; Rais-Bahrami S; Murphy AB; Ross AE; Gupta GN
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Mar; 7(3):e241516. PubMed ID: 38451522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of 29 MHz transrectal micro-ultrasound to stratify the prostate cancer risk in patients with PI-RADS III lesions at multiparametric MRI: A single institutional analysis.
Avolio PP; Lughezzani G; Paciotti M; Maffei D; Uleri A; Frego N; Hurle R; Lazzeri M; Saita A; Guazzoni G; Casale P; Buffi NM
Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):832.e1-832.e7. PubMed ID: 34183255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. There Is No Way to Avoid Systematic Prostate Biopsies in Addition to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsies.
Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Soligo M; Brembilla G; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Bravi CA; Dehò F; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Karnes RJ; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 31411973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External Validation and Comparison of Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators Incorporating Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Saba K; Wettstein MS; Lieger L; Hötker AM; Donati OF; Moch H; Ankerst DP; Poyet C; Sulser T; Eberli D; Mortezavi A
J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):719-726. PubMed ID: 31651228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Avoiding Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Biopsies: Negative and Positive Predictive Value of MRI According to Prostate-specific Antigen Density, 4Kscore and Risk Calculators.
Falagario UG; Martini A; Wajswol E; Treacy PJ; Ratnani P; Jambor I; Anastos H; Lewis S; Haines K; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Rastinehad AR; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):700-704. PubMed ID: 31548130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Different diagnostic strategies combining prostate health index and magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate cancer: A multicentre study.
Zhu M; Fu Q; Zang Y; Shao Z; Zhou Y; Jiang Z; Wang W; Shi B; Chen S; Zhu Y
Urol Oncol; 2024 May; 42(5):159.e17-159.e23. PubMed ID: 38480077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel nomogram combined PIRADS v2 and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to predict the risk of clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PSA < 10 ng/ml at first biopsy.
Sun J; Zhang Z; OuYang J
Urol Oncol; 2020 May; 38(5):401-409. PubMed ID: 31870724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
